<i>The Economist</i> on our election: Kerry. Because he sucks, but Bush is worse.


Categories: Personal

The Economist’s story on the election says about what I’d say.

I particularly like this paragraph:

The biggest mistake, though, was one that will haunt America for years to come. It lay in dealing with prisoners-of-war by sending hundreds of them to the American base at Guant´┐Żnamo Bay in Cuba, putting them in a legal limbo, outside the Geneva conventions and outside America’s own legal system. That act reflected a genuinely difficult problem: that of having captured people of unknown status but many of whom probably did want to kill Americans, at a time when to set them free would have been politically controversial, to say the least. That difficulty cannot neutralise the damage caused by this decision, however. Today, Guant´┐Żnamo Bay offers constant evidence of America’s hypocrisy, evidence that is disturbing for those who sympathise with it, cause-affirming for those who hate it. This administration, which claims to be fighting for justice, the rule of law and liberty, is incarcerating hundreds of people, whether innocent or guilty, without trial or access to legal representation. The White House’s proposed remedy, namely military tribunals, merely compounds the problem.

Amen. Amen.

It is this decision, this policy, that most flagrantly flies in the face of Bush’s constant claims to be a Christian man of deep faith. How can any follower of the one who came to set the captives free, do this?