So, I got a call billed to my account “on behalf of Nationwide Connections, Inc.”. Listing the phone number 1-800-944-9646, and the web page www.oanweb.com. They claim that we got a 4-minute collect call, on November 7th, at 11:08 AM. We didn’t; our caller ID log shows no calls at all on November 7th, not even “OUT OF AREA”.
OANWEB ripoffs are apparently not unheard of.
What’s interesting is the apparent difficulty of contesting charges. Qwest says they are forwarding this bill “as a service to OAN services inc”, but OAN services, who are (from their page) obviously not any kind of long distance company, but rather, a small-time financial scam organization of some sort, are probably just ripping people off by bits and pieces here and there.
I’ll see whether I can make any progress on this.
They are the front end for all sorts of slammers.
Hand 'em over the the FCC and the AG.
— seebs_lawyer · 2004-12-11 09:56 · #
--seebs' mom
— linsee · 2004-12-13 10:38 · #
— Brent Filler · 2004-12-13 13:36 · #
Anyway, they said that OANWEB.COM really is them, although I think the woman I spoke to was not paying close attention. I told her I was home and would have noticed the phone ringing, and that our caller ID log showed no calls at all on November 7th, but she said "since you say there was no one home to accept the call, we will mark that you dispute the charge, and a reversed charge should show up on your phone bill within one or two months".
Needless to say, I'm not entirely optimistic.
— seebs · 2004-12-13 18:04 · #
Looks like a scam and a fraud. Why aren't these people in jail?
Copies to the Washington PUC and etc.
— Byron Swanson · 2004-12-15 20:33 · #
— Larry Ausink · 2004-12-15 20:54 · #
I am told that Qwest is probably legally obliged to pass the charges on... The thing to do is make FCC complaints until the FCC yanks the licensing that gives these people the power to send on "real" phone bills.
The FCC has a complaint form you can fill out online. I did. If enough other people do, the FCC may start looking more closely at OAN, OANWEB, OANSERVICES, OAN Services, or whatever they want to call themselves, or perhaps more specifically at Nationwide Connections, who appear to be the underlying agency.
My understanding is that OAN is a big front-end firm that does billing for a lot of places, some of which may be, through sheer coincidence, legitimate.
— seebs · 2004-12-16 06:27 · #
— Barry W · 2004-12-16 22:45 · #
— Marc K · 2004-12-17 12:53 · #
— Dave W · 2004-12-19 02:59 · #
This form of fraud is known as "cramming".
— Brent Filler · 2004-12-20 17:17 · #
— Steve · 2004-12-25 01:27 · #
— Jim · 2004-12-27 13:29 · #
http://www.thedailystar.com/news/stories/2001/06/11/phonescam.html
That story didn't blame OAN for the problem, but eventually some folks realized that OAN does business with very bad customers. In 2001, the California PUC sued some phone scammers, later adding OAN and some other billing companies to the suit:
http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/proceedings/I9808004.htm
The courts eventually vacated OAN from the case. Around the same time, OAN went bankrupt, and a rival company bought them out:
http://sanantonio.bizjournals.com/sanantonio/stories/2001/05/28/daily18.html
However, the new owners apparently aren't any better. In fact, Verizon recently suspended billing for USA Voicemail, one of OAN's sibling companies:
http://www.nbc10.com/consumeralert/3888234/detail.html
This company has been up to no good for a long time.
— Bradd · 2004-12-28 04:16 · #
As for the OAN Services that charged me $20.55 for email svc: I DO NOT AND NEVER HAVE HAD EMAIL SERVICES from anyone other than AOL! I don't have any idea where that came from and want it removed immediately. I don't want these scammers, both OAN SERVICES AND APDI putting erroneous charges on my Sprint bill. It's causing me much duress, a lot of 'time' I don't have to straighten it all out, and certainly causing me to question as to why you would allow such tactics when indeed in so doing you would start losing a lot of customers! There are letters all over the Internet about OAN SERVICES, warning people that they are the biggest SCAMMERS and there are countless testimonials of what they've illegally gotten away with. I have tried to call (for a total of 19 hours) to contact them by phone 800-713-9078 to no avail! I either get a fast busy curcuit signal or a recording that puts me on hold 20 to 30 minutes at a time. I don't have time NOR should I be asked to take the time to try and track these thieves down. I've tried. Now it's your turn. Please remove this charge from my bill in its totally. Hopefully this will be the last I'll have to deal with such nonsense. Thank you for your immediate attention to this matter.
vegas von
— Voneta · 2005-01-03 17:51 · #
W
— billd · 2005-01-05 15:16 · #
Sean
— Sean Reifschneider · 2005-01-05 18:01 · #
I then called OAN and they agreed to issue a credit. Then I called Qwest and informed them that I am not going to pay the $5.99 + $0.40 tax. The Qwest person agreed to make a note on my record that this is what I intend to do.
Francis
— francis hutto · 2005-01-06 15:49 · #
Oily bastards. I'm calling Qwest, then submitting an FTC complaint.
— Rob Hill · 2005-01-10 21:07 · #
— nell · 2005-01-14 07:48 · #
— mary · 2005-01-16 00:43 · #
We'll see how this turns out. Sounds like a scam to me alright because there are lots and lots of businesses (probably even ordinary consumers) that don't take time to comb through their bills each month. In this case, I'll come out okay because this was the final bill for this particular number and Verizon said they were crediting my account. Those of you who need continuous service though, I sympathize with you! I too hope someone is able to nail these outfits to the wall!
— Phil · 2005-01-18 19:09 · #
— Darren · 2005-01-20 17:45 · #
— Sam · 2005-01-24 16:45 · #
Unless you request that they do an investigation, it sounds like they don't really care about the false charge.
I'D HIGHLY RECOMMEND THAT ANYONE WHO CALLS NATIONWIDE CONNECTIONS REQUEST THAT THEY DO AN INVESTIGATION.
It's one of the few ways that we can be sure that the people making these charges be shut down.
I also filed a compltain at the FTC. It's real easy -- go to ftc.gov, and across the top of the page is a menu bar. One of those items is to submit a complaint. All you have to do is fill in the form and submit it.
Sean
— Sean Reifschneider · 2005-01-25 15:31 · #
web site this is intersate fraud they will respound.
— mcoats · 2005-02-06 09:18 · #
I'm also going to ask Qwest if there's any way to block billing crap like this.
Keep the peace(es).
— Bruce Lane · 2005-02-20 12:42 · #
Off to the California attorney General, CPUC, FCC, FDA, and whoever else.
If the major telephone carriers are conspiring with the scammers, is there a RICO lawsuit here?
— George Swall · 2005-02-20 15:10 · #
— lou linderman · 2005-02-20 23:11 · #
Thank you.
— Sullivan · 2005-02-21 19:20 · #
— Sullivan · 2005-02-21 19:29 · #
— john · 2005-02-24 19:36 · #
This is a scam.
— William · 2005-02-25 10:01 · #
— Tammi · 2005-02-26 08:34 · #
— Tammi · 2005-02-26 08:41 · #
Nationwide Connections, Inc.
800-944-9646
222 Lakeview Avenue, Suite 160-157
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
OAN
800-926-7514
9255 Corbin Avenue
Northridge, CA 91325
I plan on writing letters of cease and desist and to file a complaint with the FTC.
I totally agree that this is wrong and given enough people overlook the charges, big bucks are being racked up in erroneous billing.
— Beth · 2005-03-01 14:45 · #
" you'll get your money back in 2 to 3 billing cycles. " its such bull shit.. wanna know who the owner is? go google " Willoughby Farr " you'll see the mess the man's gotten him self into.. the funny thing is that no one has ever signed up for any of his companys.. yet the mans made millions.. its such a waste.. anyways.. good luck getting your money back..
— Sid Rage · 2005-03-02 09:30 · #
— kelley young · 2005-03-04 13:38 · #
— Joy Biondi · 2005-03-04 18:41 · #
I have filed a complaint with both the FTC and the FCC, and I will attempt to call them tomorrow, though it does not sound like it will do much good. By the way, the number I am supposed to call is 800-944-9646. It sounds like their "contact numbers" are all different.
I don't really think this is "cramming" though -- it sounds to me as if "cramming" is when your phone company attempts to charge you for services you have not signed up for. This is something different.
— Cynthia DuBose · 2005-03-04 21:35 · #
EVERYONE-LET'S SPEND A LITTLE TIME-TO PUT THESE
CREEPS BEHIND BARS. THEY ARE BANKING ON PEOPLE
JUST IGNORING A SMALL AMOUNT. NOT ME , I'LL TRY
MY BEST TO GET ALL OF THEM TIME IN PRISON.
WILL TOY HELP ME PUT THESE THIEVES AWAY
— John Thompson · 2005-03-08 16:27 · #
The charge was obviously fraudulent, so here are a few steps to help others get OAN Services to credit the invalid charges.
1. Call the telephone company that is charging you for the alleged service. For example, AT & T, MCI, Qwest, etc.
2. Explain that the charge is fraudulent and that this company has a history of falsely charging for services that it does not provided.
3. Write down the name of the person who will help you stop the charges.
4. Ask that person to make a three person call to the Nationwide Connections, Inc to stop the charges.
5. As soon as the person from Nationwide Connections, Inc answers the telephone have him give his name and operator number.
6. Explain that the charges on your telephone bill from his company are fraudulent, and ask him to cancel the charges.
7. Write down the time, date, person that you spoke to, and what the person said. Ask for the reference number that the person will use to document the credit to your account.
8. Write down when the credit will be applied to your account.
9. Ask for the Telephone Operator's contact information so that you can get back to your telephone company (AT & T, MCI, Qwest, etc). This is important so that there is a record somewhere about your call.
10. Mark you calendar and make sure that the credit is applied to your account.
11. If the credit does not show up on your account within two months then contact your telephone company (AT & T, MCI, Qwest, etc) and explain what happened. Inform the person at your telephone company that you were told that the account would be credited. Be sure that they credit your account.
12. Contact your Better Business Bureau, and post your experience to the Web.
Good luck!
— Kate Serge · 2005-03-10 14:20 · #
— Jeff Forbes · 2005-03-11 06:53 · #
— H. E. Clements · 2005-03-11 09:20 · #
— J. E. Harris · 2005-03-12 19:02 · #
ACI bought out OAN in 2001, I think. However, I also found where some telephone companies still list them as "OAN".
I found this contact info on ACI:
ACI Billing Services Inc.
9255 Corbin Ave. Northridge, CA 91324
Phone: (818) 678-4626
Fax: (818) 709-1940
E-mail: jmerkt@acibilling.com
Web: www.acibilling.com
Contact: Jerry Merkt
BACK OFFICE SYSTEMS/OSS - Billing, Customer Care
There is a form on ACI's website that you can use to submit complaint about your telephone bill. I don't know if it works or not, but it does go through when you submit it and you can print a copy of it for your records.
My little blurb to them included cautioning them to examine their business practices and to take care of the collect call on my bill that I never received. I also told them that I would prefer that they handed this instead of forcing me to contact my attorney general and the FCC. We'll see what kind of response that gets.
See this page to note that a representative of OAN Services is on the BOARD of SERB, the "responsible billing coalition". What a joke.
http://www.cerb.org/directors.html
If you look on this page, you can see that ACI and OAN have the same address, confirming that they are one and the same entity:
http://64.233.187.104/search?q=cache:xx_5jH7BTJkJ:www.x-changemag.com/articles/351supsys.html+818-709-1940&hl=en&ie=UTF-8
Here is the direct link to report telephone bill complaint to ACI:
http://www.acibilling.com/phonebill.html
— daughter of OAN collect call scan · 2005-03-13 06:07 · #
It will also confirm there that ACI billing is one and the same company and you will also see Nationwide Comm INC pulled up in the same search results. This gets deeper and deeper and I don't know why the FCC doesn't get on these people like ugly on an ape.
— daughter of collect call scam victim again · 2005-03-13 06:14 · #
— nate coutts · 2005-03-13 06:45 · #
http://www.acibilling.com/phonebill.html
I have gotten a reply email back from them a couple of hours after I sent the email from their site. It said someone would contact me in a day or two. So evidently the link DOES get to someone somewhere (GOK where)
I called the number that the original collect call to my mother originated from , it was a truck stop called B & B in Lynn Indiana. Anybody else out there have any calls from this place? Their pay phone number is 765-874-9909.
Just wondering....this is such a travesty to have this happening to old folks like my mom. It worries the heck out of her.
— daughter of OAN collect call scam victim · 2005-03-13 08:52 · #
Faster than a speeding bullet. Must be one reason people have problems tracking down these companies.
http://hotjobs.yahoo.com/Company-Profiles/B/Billing-Concepts-Inc-Jobs_26175
— daughter of OAN collect call scam · 2005-03-13 09:48 · #
OAN Services charge to our home business phone for a collect call from Beavercreek Ohio. I immediately suspected a scam and voila, upon typing in OAN Services, came across this website.
I was shocked to learn that this scamming is so rampant. I am going to register my complaint with the FTC at www.ftc.gov.
— Andy · 2005-03-15 09:51 · #
— Jay · 2005-03-15 20:19 · #
— Jeff · 2005-03-15 22:42 · #
— Andy · 2005-03-16 11:12 · #
— Carla · 2005-03-17 00:14 · #
Thank you for this forum.
— Dennis · 2005-03-19 10:10 · #
— Daniel Mei · 2005-03-19 18:41 · #
Vonage anyone? I'm seriously considering it.
— Jacque O'Boyle · 2005-03-19 20:09 · #
Called Qwest and filed FTC complaints against OAN and Qwest.
— Tom · 2005-03-21 11:20 · #
— Mimi Blank · 2005-03-22 10:17 · #
Any ideas on what we as consumers can do to get companies like this shut down and fined??
— Kay at Dever · 2005-03-22 11:01 · #
I just got an OAN charge for a call to Chicago, 702 555 1212 for $6.17. I don't even know anyone in Chicago. Why does Quest pass on these phony charges? Margaret Coe
oan
— Margaret Coe · 2005-03-22 22:18 · #
I called 800-892-8424 this morning and surprisingly "Jessica #147" answered in under 2 minutes. She was at least polite and said they'll reverse the charge in 1 or 2 billing cycles--we'll see.
I then called Verizon to complain about why they haven't done anything against OAN Services. "Sherry @Ohio" said they're obligated to pass on the charge. They won't even register my formal complaint and investigate the incidence because they're plain not "responsible". It's probably more the case that they don't want to do anything rather than they can't. I asked about having collected calls blocked but that would cost a $2 monthly fee!
Anyway, I am so disgusted by Verizon--because I think they're ultimately responsible and should look out for their customers. I'll be looking for alternative phone and broadband internet services soon.
— Carl · 2005-03-23 12:57 · #
This month I noticed and extra charge from OAN Services stating a phone call on behalf of TELESEVEN LLC to this phone number 702-555-1212 for 4.34 which after taxes ends up being 6.44
I called the 1800 number the give but it doesn't even ring/call. 1-800-926-6435
Any suggestions? I don't want to pay for this made up B.S.!!
Help is most welcomed.
— Juan · 2005-03-26 19:18 · #
— John Bamford · 2005-03-26 22:58 · #
— C. Domingo · 2005-03-27 21:22 · #
— V · 2005-03-29 12:14 · #
— Lois · 2005-03-29 16:19 · #
— Marc Breitsprecher · 2005-03-30 20:52 · #
When I called Qwest on 14 March 2005, Brian, the customer service rep, suggested that I check the internet for OAN, and I found you folks. After careful deliberation, I have filed an FTC complaint (thank you for the suggestion), and this morning I called OAN three times to complain, but their answering system simply dropped my call each and every time.
I then called Qwest.
Crystal, the customer service rep who answered my call, listened to my complaint and what I wanted to do about it carefully. I gave her this web address, and she said that she would read it. After we discussed the available options and the actions that I had already taken, she initated a three-way call with OAN (1-800-947-5084), which brought "Gloria, operator # 135" on the line, who then informed me that 503-256-9109 was a pay phone, and that SOMEONE must have answered that collect call.
When I informed "Gloria" that A) there was no record on our caller ID of an incoming call from that number on that day at that time, B) the number was disconnected when I called it, C) no one in our household knows anyone in the state of Oregon, and D) I had already filed an FTC complaint, and would continue to file one each bill until the charges were dropped from my phone bill, she grudgingly agreed to reverse the charges. She told me that it would take 30 to 60 days to apply the reverses.
After OAN diconnected, the Qwest cutomer service rep, Crystal, ran the reverse through right then and there. In retrospect, carefully reading this site and your postings gave me the correct information, and allowed me to solve this problem with the minimum ammount of fuss.
Thank you all for your effort and time.
Matthew
— Matthew · 2005-04-01 11:07 · #
Then i searched the net and found this site. This definately sucks. I will follow the advise on these posts and file complains. I will follow up with any information in the future.
Thanks to all.
— pK · 2005-04-03 16:58 · #
— David · 2005-04-03 20:28 · #
— Michael · 2005-04-04 12:47 · #
— michael · 2005-04-04 13:01 · #
— Leanna · 2005-04-07 18:00 · #
I quickly called OAN's number (800 944-9646) and immediatly complained about fraudulent charges. The telemarketer made a feeble attempt to convince me that I accepted the bogus collect call but I firmly repeated that I will NOT pay for fraudulent charges. She then gave me a credit but that it won't show for "2-billing cycles".
I then called SBC to complain but they saw that a credit has been requested already. I then asked the SBC rep about "OAN" but she had no idea about this scam.
— vince · 2005-04-08 19:40 · #
i'm beside myself with hostility that this cr*p is going on for so long and the FCC hasn't stepped in and intervened
thanks for making all this info available
i'll call OAN tomorrow and see if i can get the $5.25 "collect call"
removed from my bill as well
SBC should know enough by now to prevent this
thanks again
kodi
— kodi · 2005-04-11 21:38 · #
I'm also trying to find a story I heard on NPR about one of their show's producers who was having problems getting charges removed from her phone bill. It was not directly related to OAN or any of that, just about the unreasonably difficult path she had to take to get it taken care of. I think they would be interested in doing a story on this. If any of you know what I talking about, please let me know if you remember the name of the show.
— Jeff · 2005-04-12 11:14 · #
— Jennifer · 2005-04-12 12:25 · #
I called SBC then to ask why they are including charges from a third party in their bill, without my authorization. They are after all not a collection agency! I asked to talk to the manager, who said she "believed" that by law they are required to include the charges of third parties, if they requested them to do so! Is this correct? if some Fictitious, Inc. sent them charges on John Doe for services NOT rendered, are they obliged to include them in THEIR bill to John Doe under law?
— Shaker B. Srinivasan · 2005-04-13 14:37 · #
— Debbie · 2005-04-14 01:34 · #
— Steve · 2005-04-15 23:49 · #
— GB · 2005-04-17 10:36 · #
— Patrick · 2005-04-22 17:49 · #
This is clear fraud. I did NOT spend eight minutes on the phone at 10:58 AM talking to a collect caller from a pay phone.
— Andy · 2005-04-24 17:06 · #
Look over your phone bills--there should be a notice that your company (this is BellSouth's phrasing) "offers options that provide for the blocking of miscellaneous third party billing..." and other things like 1-900 calls. These options are FREE and will also prevent some crooked outfit from switching your long-distance service without your permission, which is an even bigger pain in the butt to get changed back.
— Xan · 2005-04-25 15:58 · #
I have an 80 yr old mom. She is afraid to call regarding any of her health care/ doctors or any other business so I do it for her. I was to call her "SeniorCare" Customer Service line as directed by customer service on a previous call. I was to verify one of the doctors she has....I have called the same customer service line more than a few times over the past year. I had never had a problem getting through. Except for the first week in April...I called the customer service number I have always called and a voice recording came on instucting me to dial what I thought sounded like an odd phone number. I hung up thinking I had the wrong number. After I checked my mom's healthcard and... made sure.... as I entered the number that it was correct, the same recording came on. I entered the number given and another odd recording came on and I hung up. A few days later I called again and got through with no problem and forgot about it. ....Until we received this extra charge on our bill. My husband called and asked QWEST about it and they suggested we call OAN and they'd note it on our account. I called OAN this morning the 1-800-947-5084(took approx. 10 min) I spoke to "Maria" I told her I had never asked for, needed or even wanted DIR ASSIST...she said that when the a 1010 number is called they state that it is directory assistance and that there will be a charge. I told her there was no mention of directory assistance or a charge....I had the correct number and didn't need assistance but as I see was charged for something I didn't ask for or even receive! She said as a courtesty she would electronically remove the charge. I also told her there are many reports of fraudulent billing by QWEST/OAN and if they are a reputable company that they should investigate this. I also reported back to QWEST (spoke to "Pablo") and told him the update..I was informed that I was't the first person today to call about fraudulent billing. I told him QWEST needs to go on line and see how many other people are victims and that they are being blamed and need to check into this!! I told them that I would pay my bill minus the OAN charge. He said that they would make a note on our account and that it should not appear within 1-2 billing cycles.....The other thing that disturbs me is how many senior citzens who try to call their heathcare customer service are being charged? By the way....I called my mom's healthcare provider and reported this to them....the rep. had not heard of it and said they hadn't had trouble with their phone lines this month and would never charge someone to get through!! Just another way the scam goes on!! Should we report this to our local investigative TV stations? How can we get these guys??
— Laura · 2005-04-25 16:39 · #
— Vygis · 2005-04-28 16:32 · #
call from Portland Ore. to Spokane Wa. Collect.
No one was home April 3rd so the call couldn't have been completed. It is beyond me why Quest
is not investigating NATIONWIDE CONNECTIONS,INC.
and WWW.OANWEB.COM FOR, RUNNING THIS SCAM.
There have been a large number of complaint ongoing for months nationwide with several different phone companies.
Quessing the large number of people that overlook
and pay these bogus charges it is not a small-time scam. It is rediculus that they can get away with it this long.
mad as hell
— lyle · 2005-04-28 23:04 · #
— Dave · 2005-04-29 05:57 · #
— Brett · 2005-04-29 09:09 · #
First, the FTC will hear from me.
— Henry · 2005-04-29 12:59 · #
These people are slime. Keep sending the complaints in. The squeaky wheel gets the grease!
You'd think by now Quest would shut this nonsense down!
— Bruce · 2005-04-29 14:26 · #
— steve · 2005-05-02 09:00 · #
— steve · 2005-05-02 10:49 · #
Has anyone received a response from the FTC? Any lawyers out there want to start a clase action lawsuit? I'm in! Let's DO SOMETHING!
— Dan · 2005-05-02 15:13 · #
— Dave S · 2005-05-04 10:43 · #
— Al · 2005-05-05 16:04 · #
— Marilyn · 2005-05-05 20:20 · #
Below, is what my Yahoo mail default was set at. I never received an e-mail, nor any e-mail for welcoming me to my so-called 800 number or anything from OAN NAtionwide, except for the charge on my phone bill, for that matter (the 1x setup fee).
I strongly feel that i should not have to pay for this unauthorized charge on my phonebill because the entire purpose any confirmation e-mail is to CONFIRM, not take it upon yourselves (OAN Nationwide), to automatically assume that i wanted this service. This borderline SCAM, possibly illegal, is entirely wrong. OAN, Knowing your "confirmation" e-mails are considered SPAM, and also knowing about the problems with SPAM on people's e-mail in today's world, OAN Nationwide is continuing to send these confirmations without looking into this problem. I've done some research on this and there are others out there who are experiencing the same problem. If the charge is not "deleted" from my bill, i will create a web page and also join others for a civil law suit, report OAN Nationwide to the BBB, and join in the lawsuits already in progress in small claims court. So please remove/credit, or however you guys go about purging charges on phonebills.
---------------------------------------------
Spam Filter
SpamGuard is ON [Turn SpamGuard OFF - What's this?]
For messages SpamGuard identifies as Spam:
Immediately delete these messages upon receipt. (Note: If you choose this option, you will not be able to review the messages before they are deleted.)
Save these messages in the Bulk Folder for 1 week2 weeks1 month
— Alfie Rose · 2005-05-06 10:40 · #
— Ruben · 2005-05-07 20:43 · #
Morris
— morris · 2005-05-08 14:20 · #
Absolutely ridiculous. Not mine. Had to call SBC, punch 6 buttons, wait while listening to bad music for 20 minutes. I'm certain they'll try and hand it off to Nationwide Conn. Inc, the outfit the charge was billed "on behalf of."
My check is paid to SBC. They are responsible for eliminating this kind of scamming, in my opinion. Why are these jerks allowed to operate? Where is the control? How can someone lay something like this on an unsuspecting member of society and get away with it?
It isn't the money; it's the blatant disregard and bureaucratic shuffling that flames me out.
This has to stop.
— George Vien · 2005-05-09 10:32 · #
— chiachi · 2005-05-09 20:53 · #
(O A N SERVICES, INC.)
9255 Corbin Avenue
NORTHRIDGE, CA 91325
(818)678-4722
http://www.billingconcepts.com
BBB Rating: F
FOR MORE DETAIL INFO, PLEASE VISIT FOLLOWING BBB:
http://www.labbb.org/BBBWeb/Forms/Business/CompanyReportPage_Expository.aspx?CompanyID=43551&hAKAID=12&hAddrID=12
--------------------------------------------------
OAN SERVICES INC
8 Victory Ln #200
LIBERTY, MO 64068
elephone: (816) 792-0033
Fax: (816) 792-0033
Government Actions
April, 2003, Tri filed for protection under chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code on October 14, 2002, in Case No. 02-51141 filed in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Missouri, in Kansas City, Missouri. TRI's Plan of Reorganization was approved on February 3, 2003. TRI has struggled to implement its plan since that date and only recently concluded that it could not do so. As a result, TRI will cease operations on August 29, 2003, and liquidate. Since TRI's primary asset was it customer contracts, the liquidation will not come close to providing sufficient funds to pay off the pre-petition secured lender, let alone provide any payment to TRI's unsecured creditors including its remaining customers.
Additional DBA Names
Trisource
TRI Telecommunications
FOR MORE DETAIL INFO, PLEASE VISIT FOLLOWING BBB:
http://www.kansascity.bbb.org/commonreport.html?bid=98030215
--------------------------------------------------
OAN SERVICES INC
600 Congress #b Garden L
AUSTIN, TX 78701
Telephone: (800) 926-7514
Principal: Sylvia Castillo
Additional Addresses
7411 John Smith Dr #200
San Antonio, TX 78229
FOR MORE DETAIL INFO, PLEASE VISIT FOLLOWING BBB:
http://www.centraltx.bbb.org/commonreport.html?bid=47262
--------------------------------------------------
NATIONWIDE CONNECTION, INC
Additional Business Names: OAN Services
222 Lake View #160-157
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
FOR MORE DETAIL INFO, PLEASE VISIT FOLLOWING BBB:
http://www.bbbsoutheastflorida.org/nis/newsearch2.asp?ID=1&strBCode=06330000&ComID=0633000023001237
===================================================
Let's understand more on their domain registration info. Pay attention to the address closely. Isn't it the address of OAN Services that was reported in
BBB? How come ACI Billing Services website has OAN Services address?
Domain Name: BILLINGCONCEPTS.COM
Registrant:
Billing Concepts
7411 John Smith Drive
Suite 200
San Antonio, Texas 78229
United States
Registered through: GoDaddy.com
Domain Name: BILLINGCONCEPTS.COM
Created on: 08-Jul-97
Expires on: 07-Jul-09
Last Updated on: 03-Jun-04
Administrative Contact:
Hostmaster, Hostmaster hostmaster@billingconcepts.com
Billing Concepts
7411 John Smith Drive
Suite 200
San Antonio, Texas 78229
United States
(210) 949-7238 Fax --
Technical Contact:
Hostmaster, Hostmaster hostmaster@billingconcepts.com
Billing Concepts
7411 John Smith Drive
Suite 200
San Antonio, Texas 78229
United States
(210) 949-7238 Fax --
----------------------------------------------------
Domain Name: OANSERVICES.COM
Registrant:
ACI Billing Services
7411 John Smith Drive, Suite 200
San Antonio, TX 78229
US
Phone: 210-949-7000
Fax: 210-949-7254
Domain Name: OANSERVICES.COM
Administrative Contact :
Hostmaster, Hostmaster
hostmaster@billingconcepts.com
7411 John Smith Drive
San Antonio, TX 78229
US
Phone: 210-949-7238
Record expires on 17-Dec-2006
Record created on 21-Dec-2003
*******************************************************
NOTE:
Even though they look like different companies, they sort of related to each other and form a ring around the nation, from west coast to east coast. Let's connect dots to understand this operation ring.
GIVEN:
OAN Services has the following addresses
Northridge CA, LIBERTY, MO, SAN ANTONIO, TX and AUSTIN, TX
ACI Billing Services has the following addresses
Northridge CA and SAN ANTONIO, TX
Nationwide Connection, Inc. has additional business name as OAN Services
but with address in different state
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
GROUPING:
Nationwide Connection = OAN Services
ACI Billing Servies (BBB Member with rating F) = OAN Services
ASSUMPTION RESULT:
OAN Services = ACI Billing Services = Nationwide Connection Inc.
— chiachi · 2005-05-10 03:01 · #
— Chris Howard · 2005-05-10 16:21 · #
— Carla · 2005-05-15 12:00 · #
— sbardhan · 2005-05-17 13:41 · #
— Andy · 2005-05-20 16:10 · #
— Jeff · 2005-05-22 11:32 · #
-M
— rick · 2005-05-22 13:37 · #
— GB · 2005-05-23 06:59 · #
I got a Qwest representative who called Nationwide and was given the same number for Teleseven that he had just called to contact Nationwide. He took the OAN charges off my QWest bill so I will not have to pay. But how many other people have been taken in by this scam? How many would have not called Nationwide in the first place and how many would have been happy when half the charges were dropped? I spent over two hours getting $15.63 off my phone bill!
— GD · 2005-05-23 14:41 · #
Date: 3/29/5
Time: 2:31 PM
From: Long Beach, NY
Number: 516-432-9723
Length: 8:00
Cost: $7.34 (with taxes)
I called the billing number listed on my phone bill, 800-944-9646, and spoke with Operator # 134 who called himself Gabino.
He informed me the call was from a pay phone and the actual duration was 8 minutes and 35 seconds.
I told him that the number listed was a fax line and was not equipped to answer voice calls or accept collect calls. It accepts only fax transmissions.
He told me he will file a dispute and it will be credited to me.
In any event, I plan to call my local carrier, Verizon, when they reopen for business in the morning to get them on a 3-way call with this company to ensure I cover my arse.
— Karen · 2005-05-24 17:30 · #
— Mark S · 2005-05-26 12:04 · #
— Steve · 2005-05-26 22:23 · #
— Darlene · 2005-05-27 16:19 · #
— Pedretti · 2005-05-31 20:56 · #
— Teresa · 2005-05-31 21:40 · #
— Addison · 2005-06-01 11:13 · #
— Vic · 2005-06-06 09:35 · #
— Harry · 2005-06-06 22:49 · #
— peter kim · 2005-06-09 03:45 · #
— Jim · 2005-06-10 16:14 · #
I'll be contacting the FTC as well.
— Ken · 2005-06-10 19:05 · #
— Bob · 2005-06-11 16:20 · #
"on behalf of Nationwide Connect, Inc." for 7.43, added to my Sprint bill. It looks like it's a collect call from Omaha, NE. I've never been there and don't know a soul in Nebraska!
All offices are closed right now, so we'll see how long it takes to get this resolved on Monday.
What a SCAM!!!
— BJT · 2005-06-12 02:39 · #
— Charng-Ching · 2005-06-12 11:23 · #
OAN Services, Inc, the clearinghouse agent for Nationwide Conn. Inc., Collect Call/Operator Assisted Call on May 18 at 8:50pm from 505-863-9613, Gallup NM, to my house... 6 min., charge: $6.25, we never accepted ANY collect call, call did not happen, nothing on my caller ID from that day, etc.
OAN 800-982-8424
Nationwide Conn 800-944-9646
I'm not paying this, obviously, and I wrote that on my Verizon bill.
I filled out form for FCC for "Cramming":
http://svartifoss2.fcc.gov/cib/fcc475.cfm
and, i'm on the FTC site right now.
Anything else we can do? Sucks we have to research someone else's scam...
— Brian · 2005-06-12 17:39 · #
— RICHARD WEST · 2005-06-13 21:03 · #
Our company was billed $6.25 for a collect call from Fairflssun, Ca 707-864-9709 on May 5 at 2:25 p.m. The call supposedly lasted for 6.9 minutes. When I called SBC to complain they put me through to an OAN (or it may have been Nationwide) representative named Gladys (rep. 142). She told me the call was from a pay phone. I told her we are an electronics business that sells to companies and it was extremely unlikely that one of our customers would go to a pay phone to make a call. I told her this was a scam and they needed to reverse the charges and that I was contacting government agencies about their game. She said the charges would be reversed and I would see the refund in 1 to 2 months. I will advise if we do not receive the refund.
In the meantime, I have written to the FCC and plan write to the Florida Attorney General's Office since "Gladys" gave me a headquarters address of:
222 Lakeview Suites 157-160
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Maybe the more complaints are received the better.
I think class action would be wonderful. I'm on hold with OAN right now and I just found out after going through 3 levels of supervision that OAN (stands for Operator Assistance Network) is located in Texas. Their address is:
7411 John Smith Dr. Ste. 200
San Antonio, Texas 78229
Debbie Hartmann is a manager there.
Let's all keep calling and asking her why they keep billing on behalf of Nationwide Conn. 1-800-944-9646
— martha o · 2005-06-14 16:30 · #
— Layton · 2005-06-15 21:28 · #
— Mary · 2005-06-16 09:58 · #
— BGW · 2005-06-17 16:31 · #
— Bob · 2005-06-19 23:52 · #
— PA · 2005-06-20 11:08 · #
I did what everyone on this site has done. The day I got the first bill I noticed the scam. Called all the numbers, talked to all the people, wrote down the names and numbers transferred to, had all the promises made of "unsubscribing" me from the services and getting refunds - of course taking at least 2 more billing cycles.
My local company voided the first bill but told me it was one time only and I had to take care of any others, and to be alert and check for refunds. They said if I don't pay any future charges they will eventully mark my account delinquent and send bill collectors and so on. They know I didn't sign up for these services, I have complaints in, I've reported them (like everyone) to to all the various Government agencies, and yet ultimately I'm still responsible.
Just got the 2nd bill today with the charges again and no refund. And I'm still subscribing to the service according to this bill.
So, has anyone gotten any resolution? Any refunds? Any monthy charges finally dropped?
I'm thinking the promises made by these operators of refunds and unsubscrbing are false and wonder what other steps can be taken.
— DG · 2005-06-20 18:10 · #
These are all the same people. OAN=Nationwide Connections. I got my refud for a bogus collect call after two billing cycles but it took follow up with both Qwest and OAN. I can not believe noone is not doing a thing about this faud. I have sent complaints to BBC and FCC months ago. Keep fighting these scammers!
— Carla · 2005-06-20 23:16 · #
— Karen · 2005-06-23 17:56 · #
— GB · 2005-06-24 14:07 · #
FILE the COMPLAINT, it seems that OAN must reply to these complaints as i too was scammed by OAN- Nationwide Connections
I followed the advice i read on this site, was reimbursed by OAN (i have to check but they said i was on my last bill) and they now have to reply to the FCC, so make the complaint, if enough of you make the effort it won't be cost effective for them to continue these business practices!!!!
Make the Complaint please
tell the FCC
— David · 2005-06-25 18:22 · #
....DDA
— Douglas Atkins · 2005-06-25 18:41 · #
I called Sprint and spoke with a very sweet operator and told her the situation. She said that she was aware of OAN (with a giggle) and said that she would put through the request for credit immediately.
If anyone is considering a class action suit against OAN, please add me to the list. Anyone contacting me at my email address, please put OAN in the subject. I do not open any emails from people I do not know, especially if they contain attachments.
— David · 2005-06-27 07:41 · #
— Pedretti · 2005-06-27 19:55 · #
I shot a letter off to my carrier Verizon, the FCC, and the State of CA CPUC. Probably won't do much good but it will always help.
— Patrick Bane · 2005-07-04 14:50 · #
We will also make some complaint to regulatory authorities but I do not expect any changes as a result.
— Controller · 2005-07-07 17:07 · #
— Karen in NM · 2005-07-09 10:49 · #
— JW IN PA · 2005-07-10 08:54 · #
— Bernie · 2005-07-11 08:42 · #
— Judy · 2005-07-11 13:40 · #
— CV · 2005-07-11 20:54 · #
— gary · 2005-07-12 00:15 · #
I'll call Qwest/Oan tomorrow, have already filed FCC form 475.
— Roy · 2005-07-12 01:23 · #
— janie lopez · 2005-07-13 18:35 · #
I called Qwest, and the rep said he'd credit my account next month. He says OAN may contact me directly for the payment, or they'd forget about it. I'll file a complaint with the FTC anyway.
This has been going on for way too long. They should be in jail.
— J Marshall · 2005-07-13 20:13 · #
What they do is buy all of your numbers from a company that doesnt know what they are using them for.
Then you get charged for these crazy calls that you didnt accept... the person that owns this company (Willougby Farr) can not operate a buisness in Florida so he has the company under someone else's name.. her name is Yaret Garcia.
They are all getting rich from stealing our money... and when I say rich I am not kidding.. million dollar mansions and many Bentleys later.. this man is still making millions from our familys.. can I tell you that so many people dont even notice these calls...its really sad and disgusting.
Did they tell you it was a billing error when you managed to get through or did they say maybe the lines got crossed... thats what they tell everyone, thats what there TRAINED to say.
Heres the REAL adress... 215 5th st. suite 306 WPB, FL 33401 and the real phone number is 561-802-4344.
— jane · 2005-07-14 16:01 · #
Anyone else have any suggestions on how to get our money back and stop this Bastards.
— Edgar · 2005-07-15 03:47 · #
— Jerry H · 2005-07-18 09:35 · #
So I'm thinking maybe Qwest doesn't mind all this too much. Also I imagine they get a percentage for acting as the biller for 3rd party companies.
I also called the Nationwide Connections number. The "lady" who answered was obviously working off a script. Did anyone in the family blah, blah. That came to a halt when I said let's just skip this crap; you're well known scammers, it's all over the Internet. She says they'll take care of it within 2 billing cycles. Right.
— john_3000 · 2005-07-18 13:52 · #
— Peter P. · 2005-07-19 12:17 · #
Don't spend your time on this, it is Qwest's responsibility. If they won't help you, take your business elsewhere.
— Glenn · 2005-07-22 10:15 · #
— Jimmy · 2005-07-23 04:34 · #
— Bill · 2005-07-23 13:56 · #
OAN, Services and Nationwide Conn. same as above.
I've submitted the complaint to the FCC, but I'm afraid to write a letter to addressed posted above because it will just give someone there the chance to hit my phone number again.
— George · 2005-07-26 23:10 · #
So far, I have emailed the FCC (www.fcc.gov - form 475) and requested that they shut down this scam and investigate OAN.
The more consumers push the regulators, the sooner they will take action. JUST DO IT!
— Paul · 2005-07-27 23:10 · #
Location: Fresno, CA
Billed By: OAN Services, Inc.
On Behalf of: West Star Telecom
Amount: $15.82
Alleged Call: 7/7 850A Mexico 526222221 RBO 14.0 min
Fact: Never happened. I don't believe there are even enough numbers there to reach a phone in Mexico.
Notes:
These guys are buying their caller names from an outfit called Accudata Technologies (www.accudatatech.com) I wrote an email to their CEO, a Greg Smith (gregs@accudatatech.com). Maybe if a few other people did the same thing...
I'm goint to try the Secretary of State, too. See if their corporation can be yanked.
Thanks for the info, links to the FTC, etc.
— Dave A · 2005-07-28 23:00 · #
— Mauricio · 2005-07-30 13:53 · #
— Mike · 2005-08-02 08:22 · #
Now we are receiving strange phone calls from a West Asset Managment company - who when we ask why they are calling, hang up on us. So frustrating and infuriating!
— Drea · 2005-08-02 15:59 · #
— Stacy · 2005-08-04 20:40 · #
— Jessica · 2005-08-05 00:39 · #
This is making me maaaaad.
— Jessica · 2005-08-05 00:45 · #
Called SBC to remove charge which they will do,but I may still receive an individual bill from OAN. Informed the rep. that there seems to be scam going on. He respond indifferently stating that there are hundreds of long distance carriers and that basically SBC has no responsibility for the scamming of their customers that is the governments job.
— Karen · 2005-08-05 10:40 · #
— kj · 2005-08-05 14:44 · #
I filed complaints with Qwest, the Oregon Attorney General, the FTC and a local TV consumer reporter.
One particularly appalling part of the experience is that Qwest says I have to complain to Nationwide Connections/OAN... but the contact web site listed on my Qwest bill (www.oanweb.com) doesn't exist.
Doesn't Qwest at least have some responsibility to ensure that the contact information for third-party billers is accurate?
— Andrew · 2005-08-06 00:06 · #
I FINALLY have resolution! It did take till the 3rd billing cycle for the monthly charges to stop and the refund/credit from OAN/Nationwide to show up on my phone bill, but it did show up and that's what matters. My local phone company also told me they blocked my number from receiving charges from either company in the future. Hopefully this is over for me, (this time) but these companies need to be stopped. Please everyone - file complaints with your various government agencies (maybe someone, somewhere, will pay attention), and make sure all your friends & families are aware of this scam and to always check their bills!
— DG · 2005-08-06 12:32 · #
— RICHARD WEST · 2005-08-08 13:41 · #
— Laura · 2005-08-09 09:46 · #
Since the content is not news to the FCC, I suspect it was never sent there --- it's only supposed to make me think the FCC has somehow done its thing and is now out of the loop. But I did fill in one of those online complaint forms so I guess it's possible the FCC contacted them.
Anyway here is the letter:
http://members.cox.net/john.w.mckown/mendoza.jpg
Did anyone else get one like this?
— john_3000 · 2005-08-09 10:52 · #
— Stacey · 2005-08-11 00:37 · #
I've written the FCC with my complaint. Something needs to be done to see to it that these animals no longer scam people.
— S Falcon · 2005-08-16 13:28 · #
Pete
— Pete Wells · 2005-08-16 18:23 · #
So again, OAN or ESBI is not the companies you want.. it is the companies that run the ads that get you..
and also to be honest ... most of you people are dumb who do it. Who really puts their personal info on the computer for free things? you live in america you should know nothing is free... Or at least read everything before you go clicking away cause you need to have a free dvd player...
turns out for your stupidity you're playing cat and mouse with your phone company and billing companies and the real company still scratching your head like a monkey trying to figure out how someone got your information.
Well if you never offered it, then the scammers wouldn't have it.. so stop making thier life easier...
its simple..
u went online
filled out your name address email phone number bla bla blah blah... didnt read all the fine print and sent in a million forms tring to recieve free gift cards and free phones and free this because you are greedy and stupid for thinking you would actually get the items..
you will get the items, after you pay for a good many months of service on your phone bill for BS services that aren't worth a damn...
So stop wasting your time trying to bring down OAN and ESBI... they are just billing companies for thousands of other companies... Its not thier problem how the outside companies get your john handcock to OK the charge.
— Ginger · 2005-08-16 20:56 · #
Furthermore, in every case I am aware of, no one signed anything, gave anyone permission, or anything of the sort. We even have testimony from employees that they simply bought mailing lists and generated fake charges for all the people on these lists!
The people I talked to at OAN lied to me, several times. I think the preponderance of evidence is that they are at this time knowing participants in this scheme.
— seebs · 2005-08-17 01:18 · #
— unbelievable · 2005-08-18 08:32 · #
— Codi · 2005-08-18 17:08 · #
So yes, I know what I am talking about because I had to unfortantly work for a few of these companies and deal all day with OAN and disputed charges... and it wasn't fun and I didnt know what assholes companies could be till I worked for one... so i quit
— Ginger · 2005-08-19 19:31 · #
But it was a call center, and i had no choice what project I answered the calls from. I have mouths to feed and it was a job. Customer service centers do not just answer for one place of business. It just so happened for a short period of time I was placed on those projects that set people up.. and personally i think it was a good thing cause now i know how things work, and what to avoid and I know the nicer you are to customer service reps the more you will get out of it and the faster the situation will get resolved, because its not thier fault either...
also all the theats jested at the customer service reps when people call mean nothing.. Your not actually calling the orginal company. Your just calling a call center who answers there calls. We never even saw the owners rarely. They just hire the call centers to do thier dirty work...
So go after the people who create the damn websites that screw people over.. Not the billing company or the customer service reps that know just as much as half of you...
But luckily I quit and got transfered to another part of the building for a real company. Not sneaky ones... because i agree, these people are walking to the banks with innocent hardworking peoples money...because they make it easy online on the internet posting free this or free dvd player free gift card and what not to catch ur attention in giving up the info and never reading the fine print...
but dont make it easy for them.. reporting it to the fcc or bbb or what ever really doesnt hurt them... not giving up ur info does... try to get them on the news like current affairs or something and expose them...
So believe what u want, i saw it first hand
— Ginger · 2005-08-19 19:47 · #
They simply found fraudulent charges on their phone bills for CALLS THEY NEVER MADE. The scams you're talking about are another racket these scumbags are running.
I love how you played the starving baby card though. Jeez.
— john_3000 · 2005-08-21 13:21 · #
The advertisements are set up in a way you read over where they state they charge you and or kids see free items and put thier parents info in, which is what happens nine of ten..
but ok thats all im done with this site, I just saw a post about something i felt the need to inform people who were curious about how they may have gotten some of these charges..
so thats all
peace
— Ginger · 2005-08-23 16:36 · #
http://myfloridalegal.com/Contact.nsf/Contact?OpenForm&Section=Economic_Crimes
They have a searchable database of current cases but I couldn't find anything on Nationwide Connections or OAN. I told them about this site and gave them the following comment:
Nationwide Connections Inc. /OAN adds charges for nonexistant calls to the phone bills of people all over the US. The victims are selected at random and the charges are in the $10 range. NC profits whenever these charges are not noticed and thus payed by the victims. If the victim does notice and protests with sufficient vigor, NC issues a credit.
The website listed above has postings from dozens of people who have been victimized since Dec 2004 and found each other via Google.
Apparently NC has a nice, safe scam going, down in some crack between the jurisdictions of regulators and law enforcement agencies. Can nothing be done?
— john_3000 · 2005-08-25 14:10 · #
Called the scamming company, got Operator 156, Yareli, who first told me that the call had been accepted. She backpedaled quickly when I informed her I 1) wasn't there to get a call and
2) I filed a complaint with Michigan Attorney General and FTC (which I did, wasn't just saying it). Said a refund would be issued, would take 1-2 billing cycles (yeah, right. We'll see).
Then I called SBC who quickly agreed to remove that charge from my bill.
I wish there was a class-action suit against these scumbags and hit them where it hurts - the money bag.
— Scammed in Kzoo · 2005-08-26 08:35 · #
Has anyone found resolution to this on-going problem? Meaning, has your phone bills been credited back??
— Anna · 2005-08-26 11:02 · #
As I mentioned above NC sent me a copy of a letter addressed to the FCC, ostensibly in response to an FCC inquiry.
So I guess everyone should be sure to fill out that FCC complaint form on line:
http://svartifoss2.fcc.gov/cib/fcc475.cfm
It's kind of interesting that the FCC seems to have an automated process for dealing with automated scammers. But of course that alone won't stop the scam.
The scammers would want to streamline the process of returning money to the alert fraction who notice the fraudulent charges. That's a business expense. I hope it's not deductable.
— john_3000 · 2005-08-26 14:20 · #
SWBell says I'll have to take it up with OAN. SWB says I pay or they'll cut off my phone service.
I guess I'll be tilting at windmills this week.
— Jeff Cantwell · 2005-08-27 19:45 · #
— Roy Barker · 2005-08-28 00:11 · #
On my screen this page is about 42 brower windows long. There are about 6 notes per window. People average about 2 notes each (except for me;-). So something like 126 people have posted here about being ripped off since last December. 10 dozen in 9 months. Figure 25% of all victims notice the phoney charge and eventually get their money back. Of those, maybe 1 in 10 googles OAN/NC and ends up posting here. At an average $10 per charge that works out to something like $5600/month.
You can obviously massage that number in either direction but maybe on the national scale it's small potatoes. Maybe that's why no agency is pursuing them.
— john_3000 · 2005-08-28 14:24 · #
Any phone company who cuts you off for long distance services are not telling the truth. You are only responsible for local service! In truth, you can call OAN and ask them where you credit on your bill is and get a confirmation #.
How about a class action suit people? Anyone know how to do that? Let's close these ppl down!
— Oh BOY! · 2005-08-28 22:35 · #
The operator who handles collect calls isn't supposed to connect the party to an answering machine. They are supposed to say, no one is home would you like to pay for the call and leave a message? If the response is no, the operator hangs up and doesn't charge your phone. You got some min. wager like Ginger who has no vocabulary without cussing in it and SHE calls US dumb? DUH!
— Oh Boy! · 2005-08-28 22:48 · #
— Susan · 2005-09-04 13:09 · #
Anyway, I'll be calling SBC to complain. It's incredible that stuff like this goes on. Something really needs to be done about it. Maybe a class action suit? An article in a national magazine? The more people that are aware of these fraudulent charges, the more uproar there will be.
I'll let you know what happens.
— Jim · 2005-09-05 00:12 · #
— Dan · 2005-09-05 14:29 · #
— Dan Flowers · 2005-09-05 14:29 · #
I did put a block on the line, but I thought I saw above that it doesn't really help much. We'll see.
— Jim · 2005-09-06 11:01 · #
— mark · 2005-09-06 13:37 · #
— Chuck · 2005-09-14 16:01 · #
— Sue · 2005-09-15 18:51 · #
http://members.cox.net/john.w.mckown/OAN_ripoff.html
— john_3000 · 2005-09-19 13:15 · #
— Delma Shumaker · 2005-09-20 08:33 · #
I asked the Bell South rep who did not seem to know anything about them and wanted me to call the OAN 800 number. I called and talked to someone who gave me her first name and ID number for tracking. She could not give me anything about who made this collect call. I did find that interesting because I thought all names calling collect, I thought were always kept. At least it use to be.
— Ron · 2005-09-20 09:38 · #
— JE · 2005-09-21 17:54 · #
The claim I received a collect call from Berthoud, CO, at a time and date when nobody was at my house!
— Billy Bob · 2005-09-28 12:33 · #
— Solo Art Gallery · 2005-09-28 14:34 · #
I've been trying to reach another human at Verizon to demand that they block ALL future charges from OAN, but have been unable to do so --- "Because of an emergency, your call cannot be answered at this time."
— Paul Gumerman · 2005-09-28 17:44 · #
— Karen · 2005-09-30 22:09 · #
— Mandy · 2005-10-02 06:24 · #
Just an update... I received one of the unauthorized collect calls from OAN on my voicemail and a month and a half later it came in on my Verizon bill. I went out to Google and found this site (Thanks so MUCH for being here) last night and filed a complaint with the FCC and the FTC and then this morning I called Verizon and the customer service rep sent the charge back to Oan as an unauthorized charge. FYI... She also said that you can put a block on unauthorized billing to your account for FREE. I like FREE. She also informed me that there is a law that says the carriers must allow other carriers to put charges on their bills and that there are several of the companies that are in court trying to get this law changed. AND she receives several of these complaints a day. I told her about this site so she could check it out. Again Thank You,
Susan
— Susan · 2005-10-04 11:34 · #
Verizon is no help! Submitted complaint form to FCC. Will use the above info to follow up!
10/9/05
— Berni · 2005-10-05 20:09 · #
Called the 800 number and was told the refund should be there in 2 billing cycles. Filled the FTC complaint, dont have the time to do much more...
— V Ram · 2005-10-07 12:15 · #
Gretchen at Qwest said that they are aware of all the complaints against OAN Services, but there is nothing legally they can do. She acknowledged that OAN is making Qwest look bad.
I suggested that Qwest might appease its annoyed customers slightly by keeping a tally of complaints and passing it along monthly to the FTC and FCC. If all the major telecom companies did this every month, the feds would have some idea of the scope of this scam.
— Seraphina · 2005-10-12 18:03 · #
http://www.state.ia.us/government/com/util/_private/Orders/2005/0913_fcu0552.pdf
— l · 2005-10-21 00:28 · #
— Liz · 2005-10-21 11:44 · #
— Jesse · 2005-10-24 15:33 · #
— Marilyn · 2005-10-24 18:31 · #
Thank you for contacting the Verizon eCenter. My name is Pamela.
This message is in response to your email dated October 19, 2005. You inquired about collect calls charge.
Unfortunately, Verizon is not authorized to handle any inquiries on behalf of Nationwide Connections.
Verizon has an agreement with your provider that allows us only to place their charges on your Verizon bill for your convenience. This agreement prohibits us from processing any credits to the charges for which they bill you.
Please contact Nationwide Connections directly for assistance.
Thank you for using Verizon. We appreciate your business.
Sincerely,
Pamela
Verizon eCenter
Fantastic, huh? What a help. They ARE claiming they do not have any authorization here YET they are more than willing to place a FAKE phone call on my bill. I have emailed Verizon again, to several different departments, and informed them that I believe it is irresponsible for them to continue to place these charges on their customer's bills when they are aware that this is a scam.
SOOO helpful too. Told me to call Nationwide Connections but did not provide me with a number. Now I will have to complain to Verizon about their crappy customer service too.
I agree that it is unbelieveable that no one has stopped these people yet. I am going to write a letter to my Congressman, Tom Davis, and I will be printing out all the postings here and sending them along. Hopefully his office can get some action. I would ask all of you to do likewise.
— Marianne · 2005-10-24 20:07 · #
— Doug · 2005-10-25 09:50 · #
Here is the response
Thank you for contacting the Verizon eCenter. My name is Pamela, and I will be handling your request today.
This message is in response to your email dated October 24, 2005. You inquired about collect call charge. I will be happy to assist you.
We apologize for the inconvenience to you. Verizon has processed a credit of $5.41 to your account. You may hear are receive a separate bill in regards of the charge from Nationwide Connections in the future.
You will see the credit on your next bill.
Thank you for using Verizon. We appreciate your business.
Sincerely,
Pamela
Verizon eCenter
In addition to the email I sent to Verizon, I filed a complaint with the FCC, FTC and the State of Florida. Links are here:
http://members.cox.net/john.w.mckown/OAN_ripoff.html
It is unbelieveable that this is being allowed to continue.
— Marianne · 2005-10-25 11:35 · #
Getting ready right now to file complaints with Fla AG and FCC.
— Carol · 2005-10-25 15:09 · #
I called OAN services and they immediately told me they could not refund the charge. I told her that was unacceptable and I wanted to be connected to their fraud department. After 20 minutes of arguing with her...I mean I was screaming at her...she told me she would refund the charge in 1-2 billing cycles.
I then called Verizon to let them know, the very nice lady put collect call blocks on my phone line and made sure that my account was credited. She told me to call the fcc at 1 888 225 5322 to lodge a formal complaint.
— Jill · 2005-10-28 11:37 · #
After finding this website, I called OAN (800 9444-9646) and talked with a rep (Dayner, Operator #131) who said he would reverse the charges in "1 or 2 cycles." When I commented that my Qwest bill indicated that OAN was a "new service provider" he said the were "not a service provider." I wanted to be sure that I was not being "slammed" as well.
I used the FCC complaint site: "http://svartifoss2.fcc.gov/cib/fcc475.cfm"
to add to the the case I hope they are building.
Plan to call Qwest to try to get them to block any charges from OAN but don't have much hope, based on the above comments.
— Steve · 2005-10-28 18:32 · #
I also called Qwest. I told Qwest I would not be paying that part of the bill and that it was a scam. I also asked Qwest to only bill me for their services and if anyone else wants to bill me they can send me a bill themselves. She said Qwest could not do that. And she also said that they (Qwest) do not know anything about the companies charging as 3rd party providers on their bill. I would think that if a phone company was going to associate with another company so extensively as to send a bill for them, they would want to know who the other company was and be sure they were valid and not scamming their customers on their own bill.
The Qwest billing rep said that they recieve endless complaints about OAN and it is a common problem but she was not at liberty to talk about it. She also said that Qwest could not do anything about. I guess they just don't want to.
— Angela · 2005-10-31 14:22 · #
— Shirley · 2005-11-01 01:58 · #
— Adam · 2005-11-01 17:48 · #
— Adam · 2005-11-01 18:14 · #
— Adam · 2005-11-01 18:16 · #
The charges have been removed from the bill so they say.
— Therese · 2005-11-02 17:04 · #
— Jesse · 2005-11-03 13:21 · #
The charge is for a collect call I never received and did not authorize, supposedly made Oct 13 at 7:04 PM from White Bird, ID (208-839-9498). $7.75 for 11 minutes.
I just filed my FCC complaint and will call Verizon and ask for a 3 way call, and ask them to block charges from OAN on all my bills. I also am going to check past bills... OAN sounds vaguely familiar, and I'm hoping I did not pay any past bills without smelling this rat!
P.S.
I noticed that the billing info reads: "Billing on behalf of Nationwide Conn. Inc." and then gives their phone number 1-800-944-9646.
I loved the abbreviation: Nationwide Conn.
— Paul · 2005-11-06 23:57 · #
P.S. Sprint customers: Sprint receives several complaints per week about OAN. Simply demand that they remove the charges. They will force OAN to bill you separately, and of course, you know this will not happen.
— D from Ohio · 2005-11-07 12:42 · #
I too was recently a victim of OAN. I was charged $6.44 on the 8th of October, 2005 for a collect call from a payphone in Iowa. Of course, no such call ever occurred. I immediately called QWEST (my local carrier) the next day after receiving the bill to dispute the charges. QWEST's policy, according to Tanya, is that third party charges are out of its hands and that they send charges back to the company that made the third party call. If you do not also dispute the charge with the third party company, that third party company may pursue the money using a collection agency. I had Tanya directly call OAN for a three-way call between me and Jessica from OAN and had Tanya explain my dispute for me. Jessica gave me a confirmation number, told me that in 1-2 cycles (30-60 days) my money be refunded, and blocked any future collect calls from OAN. I asked Jessica if she was aware that her company makes many fraudulent phone calls and did not receive a response. After Jessica disconnected, I told Tanya that it would be in her and QWEST's best interest if they pursued this company legally to show QWEST's customers they are doing something about fraud. She said she would keep it in mind. I doubt QWEST will do any such thing, but really hope that I get my money back.
Tim
— Tim B · 2005-11-08 10:00 · #
— shirley · 2005-11-16 01:53 · #
It's interesting OAN is keeping the tax in some cases. They refunded it to me. Don't give up on the FCC:
http://members.cox.net/john.w.mckown/OAN_ripoff.html
— John_3000 · 2005-11-16 15:58 · #
OAN Services, Inc.
600 Congress, Suite b, Garden L
Austin, TX 78701
Our Att. Gen. letter states they must "respond to each allegation in the complaint in writing" and within 14 days. Also in bold print and underlined is "A business response form letter is available online at our Homepage www.idaho.gov/ag
Well, I looked at this form letter that Oan is supposed use for a reply. Hmmmm, big deal. Seriously, this adds insult to injury. When I get OAN's response, I'll post here. This should be good.....
— shirley · 2005-11-17 00:37 · #
Las Vegas,NV
— gemma · 2005-11-18 00:37 · #
— Marty · 2005-11-18 15:45 · #
Contact
Denise Phillips at 210-949-7404 and ask her why this does not stop if you don't get anywhere with her call Melissa Gambill at 210-949-7129 and see what she says about their scam. Probably get the same run around I got from them. Willoughby Farr of NWC has been at it a long time and knows how to play the game with these Billing companies. They must be getting more than a fee from NWC and Teleseven and the rest of these companies listed.
— Donna · 2005-11-19 15:56 · #
How are they allowed to be added to Qwest's bill if they aren't even associated with them?!
I am going to call Qwest and get a 3-way conversation to hash this out. I will not pay for a fraudulant call.
After all the postings I have read, why isn't the government stopping this?!!!!!! A class action suit is in order here!
Joanna
— Joanna · 2005-11-20 02:14 · #
— ken · 2005-11-21 17:05 · #
— Robert · 2005-11-21 19:01 · #
— Miki · 2005-11-25 05:05 · #
— Patty · 2005-11-28 14:41 · #
In response to my complaint, they called me and sent me a prepaid FedEx envelop for copies of my phone bill and other supporting documentation. Once that is reviewed, they will send an affidavit for your signature, again by prepaid FedEx.
In your complaint, be sure to include your name, address and phone number.
Here is the address:
Sarah Gleich
Federal Trade Commission
600 Pennsylvania Ave.
Washington, DC 20580
You could call her (202-326-2754) except that she will be away from her office for the next two weeks.
— Paul Lepley · 2005-11-28 17:27 · #
— scott · 2005-11-29 11:46 · #
— Carole · 2005-12-02 00:35 · #
How long can these people continue? I have researched this for a month now and am amazed at how many people have been scammed. Just imagine that what you see here on the internet is only the tip of the iceberg?
— sonny · 2005-12-03 09:37 · #
http://www.ago.state.ma.us/filelibrary/ccboth.pdf
— Walter · 2005-12-03 15:40 · #
— Shawntel · 2005-12-05 17:06 · #
Something needs to be done about these guys getting rich off of people-is this becoming the american way? I sure hope not!!!!!!!!!!
— Sherry · 2005-12-06 10:59 · #
— Christine · 2005-12-07 11:04 · #
— Joyce · 2005-12-08 18:59 · #
I filed a complaint with the FCC back in March/April. I have been contacted by a lawyer with the FTC who is investigating this issue.
The wheels of government grind slowly, but they DO MOVE.
File those complaints if you haven't already. They will be looked at.
— Jeff · 2005-12-14 04:57 · #
— May · 2005-12-18 20:57 · #
— Steve · 2005-12-19 02:01 · #
— Matt · 2005-12-19 10:34 · #
— Venkat · 2005-12-19 12:51 · #
Gabor
— Gabor M. Korody · 2005-12-19 13:07 · #
— K.Lohr · 2005-12-20 10:16 · #
— May · 2005-12-20 21:34 · #
— L. Williams · 2005-12-23 12:26 · #
— Erin · 2005-12-23 14:06 · #
— paul · 2005-12-26 21:28 · #
— Dave · 2005-12-27 15:39 · #
— JoAnn Kool · 2005-12-28 11:41 · #
— Mountain View Espresso · 2005-12-30 00:02 · #
This kind of garbage makes you want to learn how you can bill people for services they never receive! It does not seem as if the phone comp. care who puts charges on your bill and also seems to almost defend these SOB's.
— Don U. · 2005-12-31 11:14 · #
Why hasn't this scamm been delt with by our gov? And the phone companies?
— anita · 2006-01-02 12:20 · #
— Dwight · 2006-01-03 09:19 · #
That is what made me think this was a scam. When was the last time you disputed anything, and didn't have to actually have a dispute with someone? It was like she knew exactly why I had called before I told her. It was just way too easy to get the charge reversed. Why did they trust me without any supporting evidence? Probably because they want me to be happy and not report their scam. While the people that don't check their bills happily make them rich. Well, I'll find out soon if they reverse the charges. I'm also going to file complaints with everyone. Hopefully one more complaint will raise someone's attention somewhere.
— Mike · 2006-01-04 23:12 · #
— Ceren Curmak · 2006-01-06 11:57 · #
A)800 Direst-Spec Svcs (1-800-520-2922)Billing for:800 Direct
monthly service fee = $4.25
monthly service fee = $4.25
monthly service fee = $8.50
monthly service fee = $8.50
monthly service fee = $8.50
B) OAN Services, Inc.(1-800-947-5084 /www.billview.com)** Billing for: Nationwide Connections, Inc (1-800-944-9646/www.OANWEB.com)
FR Brighton,CO=$5.41
FR Brighton,CO=$6.44
TO Dir Asst NV=$7.39
How can Qwest allow crooks to bill through Qwest? Why can't Qwest block them from billing us? The gal at quest said just about anyone can bill your phone line for just about anything!!! She said it's designed to help people who don't have credit cards or checking accounts. WHAT?!?!??? Heh, Qwest, here is an idea. How about helping out those of us who pay you every month.
— MARK · 2006-01-06 18:02 · #
— Patrick · 2006-01-11 15:52 · #
— Karen · 2006-01-15 12:54 · #
— Brett · 2006-01-18 17:00 · #
— Alexandra · 2006-01-20 12:23 · #
— R. D. Hodgell · 2006-01-22 23:51 · #
— Sutton · 2006-01-29 09:40 · #
— Travis · 2006-02-02 11:49 · #
Going to the FCC, FTC, Etc isn't really going to do anything, honestly. All they do is send a letter to the company in question stating that sevral people have complanied and as long as they get some kind of reply they close the case and move on. Seen it done hundreds of times. When said company gets too much "heat" they close down and set another one up. It's just that easy.
The "free" block that these companies offer you isn't anything more then a click of a button so that they don't bill you again. It works but you have to get charged in order for you to get the block.
"Why does it take 2-3 billing cycles for a credit?" Well, simply put they want to use your money in the mean time. You would be surprised how many people actually pay the whole bill and wait for the credit just so they don't have issues with their local carrier.
The best advice is watch your bills beacuse these companies aren't going to go away anytime soon. As an Ex insider i will tell you that this is a major money making business and it's a shame how easy it is to get away with.
— Jackie · 2006-02-02 21:26 · #
I'll be filing with the FCC and And the AZ AG on Monday morning. Thanks for this log, it was very helpful.
— Jon · 2006-02-04 12:26 · #
— jacobs · 2006-02-04 18:28 · #
— tanya eddy · 2006-02-06 20:16 · #
We are also located on Long Island. NY.
I plan on fighting it.
— Glenn Schabel · 2006-02-07 20:57 · #
Still, I filed a complaint with the FTC last month after this happened. No word yet from the FTC. But I see that Nationwide Connections has been sued for slamming before.
People need to be educated about checking their phone bills. This is the only way to cut off the funding for this scam.
— Brett · 2006-02-08 16:49 · #
— JasonYuen · 2006-02-13 09:31 · #
I emailed SBC, my local phone service provider, and asked them to remove this charge as I had requested no such service. Here is their reply:
Thank you for your recent email.
SBC Midwest is a billing agent for many carriers. You must contact OAN Services, Inc directly at 1-800-441-9678, Mon - Fri: 5A to 7P (PST) Sat: 5A to 6P (PST) to resolve this issue. Until you reach a successful resolution with OAN Services, Inc we are putting the amount of $15.40 in claim on their behalf. If after contacting the carrier, you are unable to reach an acceptable resolution, please advise our customer care center at 1-800-742-8771, Monday-Friday 7:00 AM-9PM, Saturday 8AM-5PM (LOCAL) Closed Sunday & SBC Holidays.
You may receive a survey asking if you are completely satisfied with the service I provided to you today. If you are not, please contact me so I can ensure you are very satisfied with the service I have provided.
Thank you for choosing the SBC family of companies. We value your business and continued loyalty.
Regards,
Your SBC Customer Service Representative
(oddly, no rep name given)
Why on earth would I need to call a suspected fraudulent company and provide my private information to attempt to remove a billing for service I never requested?
Here's what prompted my family's filing a "Don't Call" violation. Out of the blue we received a call one day that went something like this. An automated call a few weeks ago from ODYSSEY EMAIL SERVICES claiming (no subscriber name given) we had opened an account for email service consisting of 4 email accounts and if we wanted to talk to someone we should hit a number on the telephone keypad. We know better than to do that, since there is a phone racket that uses that practice to trick you into anything from switching carriers to getting billed for expensive bogus calls to foreign countries.
I don't know what's going on here with this supposed company but I am assuming the worst. But I am equally troubled that my local SBC phone company thinks email is a telephone carrier service and refused to deny the charge.
— Dan · 2006-02-13 12:31 · #
STATE tax equalling 16.15 total for Miscellaneous Charges and Credits. Wonder what that is exactly. Calling Verizon today. Thanks for the info!
— Jen · 2006-02-15 10:32 · #
— Keri · 2006-03-01 09:30 · #
I also received an OAN charge on my current Verizon phone bill. This was for some e-mail service fee billed on behalf of Odyssey Comm Svcs in Tenafly, NJ. $14.95 + state & fed taxes, totaling $16.30. I called the OAN number and spoke with "Steve". He explained that this was for an internet service offering 5 e-mail addresses, 10 hrs of internet service and software. Supposedly you can only sign up for this service online after filling out some sort of survey. I told him I never would have, knowingly, signed up for their service especially since we subscribe to cable internet service. He showed that there had already been two billings, one Jan 26 (from my current bill) and another on Feb 23 (my next bill). He agreed, without a fight, to cancel the service and issue a credit for both charges. He said that the credits should take one to two billing periods to go through.
So now I wait and see.
Next I will call Verizon to let them know I will be paying short on this bill (and possibly the next) and why.
I'm glad to have found this post! It gave me some insight before making any calls. It's also nice (and a shame) to know that your not the only one!
— Cheryl · 2006-03-01 10:04 · #
Re-reading Dan's post from Feb 13 jogged my memory about something. I came home one day in January to a message on my answering machine thanking us for signing up with e-amil service from Odyssey (I don't believe they said our name or anything else to identify us specifically). At the time, I didn't think anything of it. I figured it was just a wrong number or something. Now I know differently! I'll have to check if I deleted it or not but I probably did.
— Cheryl · 2006-03-01 10:14 · #
Good Luck to you all, because this man is a work of art...NOT....Pure Evil is more like it!
http://oris.co.palm-beach.fl.us/or_web1/details.asp?doc_id=15560568&file_num=20060134671
http://www.pbcountyclerk.com/oris/records_home.html
— joe · 2006-03-11 04:15 · #
Date: Ten minutes later, "Ok sir your name has been removed from our billing records"
Date: 031206, My at&t bill includes a charge for 14.95 for e-mail service,.45 fed. tax,.90state tax,=16.30.
Date ten minutes later, "Im sorry sir apparently the other service tech was not in the system yet and did not get you cancled in time.(30 days later) We will credit your phone bill in 30 to 60 days!!
— Robert Smith · 2006-03-13 16:01 · #
— Missy · 2006-03-20 11:20 · #
— Missy · 2006-03-20 11:23 · #
End of the Line for Phone Bill Crammers
Defendants Collected Millions For Collect Calls That Were Not Made
At the request of the Federal Trade Commission, a federal judge has halted a massive fraudulent billing scheme that has collected more than $25 million in bogus collect call charges from hundreds of thousands of consumers. The FTC charged three companies and their principals with deceptive and unfair billing practices for “cramming” – the unauthorized billing of charges on phone bills – since at least January 2004.
"Charging consumers for bogus collect calls is stealing," said Lydia Parnes, Director of the FTC's Bureau of Consumer Protection." The Federal Trade Commission will not tolerate crooks who cram unauthorized charges onto phone bills."
The FTC’s complaint alleges that, in many instances, the defendants initiated phony collect call charges, such as calls to telephone lines that were dedicated to computers and fax machines, and to phones where no one was present. In addition, some consumers'caller ID logs had no record of collect calls for which they were billed.
The FTC charged the defendants with violating Section 5 of the FTC Act by representing that consumers owed money they did not owe, and by causing consumers to be billed for collect phone calls they neither received nor authorized. According to the FTC’s complaint, the defendants claimed that they submitted charges for billing on consumers'bills on behalf of long distance service providers, although the defendants have few, if any, long distance carriers as clients. The defendants' charges typically were buried on the last page of consumers'phone bills, with each charge typically in the range of $5 to $8.
On February 27, Senior Judge Kenneth Ryskamp ordered an ex parte temporary restraining order freezing the assets of Nationwide Communications Inc., Access One Communications Inc., Network One Services Inc., and their principals, Willoughby Farr, Mary Lou Farr, Yaret Garcia, Erika Riaboukha, and Qaadir Kaid. The order appointed a temporary receiver over them and banned them from engaging in unauthorized billing.
On March 8, the court found that the defendants engaged in the widespread unauthorized billing of collect calls in violation of Section 5 of the FTC Act and entered a preliminary injunction order prohibiting them from billing or submitting any charge for billing on a consumer’s telephone bill. The order continued the asset freeze over them and appointed a permanent receiver over Nationwide Communications, Access One Communications, Network One Services, and certain affiliated entities. The FTC ultimately seeks to permanently bar the defendants from further violations, make them forfeit their ill-gotten gains, and make them pay restitution to consumers. The Commission approved the filing of the complaint in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida by a 5-0 vote.
NOTE: The Commission authorizes the filing of a complaint when it has 'reason to believe' that the law has been or is being violated, and it appears to the Commission that a proceeding is in the public interest. The complaint is not a finding or ruling that the defendant has actually violated the law. The case will be decided by the court.
Copies of the complaint are available from the FTC’s Web site at www ftc gov and from the FTC's Consumer Response Center, Room 130, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20580. The FTC works for the consumer to prevent fraudulent, deceptive, and unfair business practices in the marketplace and to provide information on 150 consumer topics, call toll-free, 1-877-FTC-HELP (1-877-382-4357), or use the complaint form at www ftc gov. The FTC enters Internet, telemarketing, identity theft, and other fraud-related complaints into Consumer Sentinel, a secure, online database help consumers spot, stop, and avoid them. To file a complaint in English or Spanish (bilingual counselors are available to take complaints), or to get free information on any of available to hundreds of civil and criminal law enforcement agencies in the U.S. and abroad.
MEDIA CONTACTS:
Mitch Katz,
Office of Public Affairs
Federal Trade Commission
202-326-2161
Frank Dorman,
Office of Public Affairs
202-326-2674
STAFF CONTACT:
Laura M. Kim, Attorney
Division of Marketing Practices
202-326-3734
— joe · 2006-03-30 05:37 · #
I think that Sprint and OAN should be defendants in this class-action (and any other phone companies who claim that nothing fraudulant has gone on here.)
— Paul Harrington · 2006-04-11 11:21 · #
— Sarah · 2006-04-13 22:29 · #
— Jeff · 2006-04-17 19:02 · #
— Jeff · 2006-04-17 19:02 · #
I got the same charge/company (ILD) on my ATT/SBC bill in houston, texas. I called sbc and they are removing the charge from my bill. Thank god for google, i found this thread and told this to my customer service agent.
— John · 2006-04-26 15:51 · #
— Sandy · 2006-05-17 18:05 · #
— Sherri Smith · 2006-05-23 20:44 · #
how can they get away with this for so long? unbelievable.
— ella gant · 2006-05-30 22:45 · #
— Anita Clark · 2006-06-04 04:10 · #
— Sandra Owens · 2006-07-15 20:05 · #
— angela · 2006-07-31 12:09 · #
Verizon posted a number to call if I had questions. I called, the person said she would reverse the charges & wanted to inform me how the program worked. If you call for a phone number and the number has been changed, this company jumps in & asks if you want the new number and you say yes... they dial it for you... you don't know what's happened until you get your phone bill. JUST SAY NO! I was not informed that it would cost me $5.52 + taxes & fees to reach my party. Our "information number was "411" - I don't know what it is now, but bet me I'll not dial 411 again to get a local phone number. I also agree, everyone should inform the FCC about this FRAUD,SCAM & other &%#@ words I should not say!
— Charles Pace,Jr. · 2006-08-03 18:29 · #
— ELIDIA CONTRERAS · 2006-08-21 10:37 · #
— Dustin · 2006-09-05 08:53 · #
— Matt Dawson · 2006-09-10 17:31 · #
Admin Fee of $1.65. I also received a charge for ESBI of $13.92. I have never gave premission to have either of these on my phone bill. I'm in the process of taking to my phone company Verizon. They say that they will give me credit but if this was made from my home they will rebill me for this. This is a bunch of bull I don't I did not make these calls or give premission to someone to make them. What can we do about these charges.
— Elizabeth Carver · 2006-09-12 17:29 · #
— Dale Simons · 2006-09-17 19:25 · #
— Barry C · 2006-09-26 23:19 · #
— James H · 2006-09-29 12:40 · #
— Patty P · 2006-10-07 11:19 · #
— Jo in NY · 2006-10-09 18:51 · #
— Jean · 2006-10-12 15:32 · #
Thanks to everyone for the information.
— Kathy in AR · 2006-10-16 12:00 · #
This shit is ridiculous and I believe somebody has to stop them because it's really sad that u can't even trust the telephone companies anymore. I advise everyone to take a closer look at your phone bills and take a closer look at internet sites when applying for anything because they will try and get you.
— Danielle in Illinois · 2006-10-24 00:51 · #
— Becca in AR · 2006-10-27 16:14 · #
PIMPING
for the the scammers (OAN, ACI, NATIONWIDE, WEST STAR, ODISSEY etc.) since they DO know who these crooks are, yet, they knowlwingly allow them to breach the trust given to them by your phone conrtract.
The class action suits should be aimed at the greedy and
criminal phone companies that participate in these scams for the obvious purpose of illegal gain.
Need to get the ear of some dedicated attorneys that are not afraid of, or beholden to, these monopolistic phone
corporations.
Gung Ho!
C. P.
— Chris. Pinta · 2006-11-02 03:43 · #
PIMPING
for the the scammers (OAN, ACI, NATIONWIDE, WEST STAR, ODISSEY etc.) since they DO know who these crooks are, yet, they knowlwingly allow them to breach the trust given to them by your phone conrtract.
The class action suits should be aimed at the greedy and
criminal phone companies that participate in these scams for the obvious purpose of illegal gain.
Need to get the ear of some dedicated attorneys that are not afraid of, or beholden to, these monopolistic phone
corporations.
Gung Ho!
C. P.
— Chris. Pinta · 2006-11-02 03:44 · #
PIMPING
for the the scammers (OAN, ACI, NATIONWIDE, WEST STAR, ODISSEY etc.) since they DO know who these crooks are, yet, they knowlwingly allow them to breach the trust given to them by your phone conrtract.
The class action suits should be aimed at the greedy and
criminal phone companies that participate in these scams for the obvious purpose of illegal gain.
Need to get the ear of some dedicated attorneys that are not afraid of, or beholden to, these monopolistic phone
corporations.
Gung Ho!
C. P.
— Chris. Pinta · 2006-11-02 03:57 · #
Seattle WA
— h · 2006-11-08 16:01 · #
Using information from this site I called Verizon to dispute the charges and block 3rd-party billing.
The Verizon rep said she would remove OAN from my account and block 3rd party billing. However, she could only post a claim against OAN on my account for the amount they billed. That means until OAN credits my account, this amount and my claim will remain outstanding.
She said I should pay only the net of Verizon billed minus my claim.
— Relmhill · 2006-11-14 13:11 · #
— MM · 2006-11-17 14:05 · #
— Phil · 2006-11-19 23:16 · #
— GAIL · 2006-11-28 07:45 · #
— r. malcolm · 2006-12-07 21:58 · #
FTC v. NATIONWIDE CONNECTIONS, INC., No. 06-80180-CIV-RYSKAMP/VITUNAC
(S.D. Fla.)
Parties:
Nationwide Connections, Inc. Access One Communications, Inc. Network One Services, Inc. Willoughby Farr Mary Lou Farr Yaret Garcia
Erika Riaboukha
Qaadir Kaid Billing Concepts, Inc. ACI Billing Services, Inc. d/b/a OAN BSG Clearing Solutions North America, LLC The Billing Resource d/b/a Integretel
Assigned Attorneys:
Laura M. Kim (BCP/MP) Michael Davis
Alleged Condu
ct: Unfair and deceptive practices in violation of Section 5 in connection with the initiation of phone charges for purported long distance collect calls.
Status:
Complaint for injunctive and other equitable relief filed 2/27/06. TRO, asset freeze and preliminary injunction order entered 3/8/06. First amended complaint adding defendants Billing Concepts, Inc., ACI Billing Services, Inc. d/b/a OAN, BSG Clearing Solutions North America, LLC and The Billing Resource d/b/a Integretel filed 9/21/06.
— john_3000 · 2006-12-08 15:17 · #
— Don Journey · 2006-12-18 02:55 · #
— tina m hutton · 2006-12-21 19:32 · #
I'll bet my bill this month has OAN charges. I already complained to verizon today. This is BS.
— Bill C-----sky · 2006-12-24 13:14 · #
— Marty · 2007-01-02 10:37 · #
— CK · 2007-01-04 08:48 · #
http://pcworld.com/printable/article/id,128206/printable.html
seebs comments: fixed URL now that it's already past the spam filters.
— john_3000 · 2007-01-07 16:20 · #
— josie arcigal · 2007-01-14 19:45 · #
— Unbelievable · 2007-01-18 21:08 · #
FTC v. NATIONWIDE CONNECTIONS, INC., No. 06-80180-CIV-RYSKAMP/VITUNAC
(S.D. Fla.)
Parties: Nationwide Connections, Inc.
Access One Communications, Inc.
Network One Services, Inc.
Willoughby Farr
Mary Lou Farr
Yaret Garcia
Erika Riaboukha
Qaadir Kaid
Billing Concepts, Inc.
ACI Billing Services, Inc. d/b/a OAN
BSG Clearing Solutions North America, LLC
The Billing Resource d/b/a Integretel
Assigned Attorneys: Laura M. Kim (BCP/MP)
Michael Davis
Collot Guerard
Marilyn E. Kerst (OGC)
Alleged Conduct: Unfair and deceptive practices in violation of Section 5 in connection with
the initiation of phone charges for purported long distance collect calls.
Status: Complaint for injunctive and other equitable relief filed 2/27/06.
TRO, asset freeze and preliminary injunction order entered 3/8/06.
First amended complaint adding defendants Billing Concepts, Inc., ACI
Billing Services, Inc. d/b/a OAN, BSG Clearing Solutions North
America, LLC and The Billing Resource d/b/a Integretel filed
9/21/06. Amended preliminary injunction order entered 9/22/06.
Contempt order against Willoughby Farr, Mary Lou Farr and Danny
Trujillo (non-party) entered 9/22/06. Notice of appeal of the amended preliminary injunction order filed
11/11/06.
— john_3000 · 2007-01-30 14:00 · #
— J and J · 2007-02-01 19:40 · #
So today, I called Verizon, told them about everything, they refunded the money and are filing a complaint against OAN services. I will be calling the NH Utilities Commission to file a complaint as well.
— Tim Runnals · 2007-02-02 09:29 · #
— bryan · 2007-02-06 17:34 · #
— Kelly Schreiman · 2007-02-20 16:28 · #
we just got billed $7.95 for a bogus directory information number.The bill was on our Verizon bill and the person I spoke to at OAN was rude but did say she would refund the money in the next 2 to 3 billing cycles!!!
— judith raynor · 2007-02-28 22:44 · #
— Mary-Anne Brister · 2007-03-01 20:48 · #
— Cynthia Wallace · 2007-03-10 18:16 · #
It was Feb 8 @ 9:56am to Dir asst NV 702-555-1212 1 min $5.49
and another Feb 15 @ 10:00 am to Dir Asst. NV 702-555-1212 1 min. $5.49
FRAUD!!! called Qwest, Public Service Com., and FCC.
Will file a complaint with Attorney General in the morning.
— Josh Dell · 2007-03-20 20:14 · #
$5.49-Toll chge.
$1.65-Misc. chges.
.22-NY Tax
---------
$7.36-Total phony chge.
I'm emailing all persons mentioned above. This is a total scam
— Margaret m. Carlin · 2007-03-27 00:56 · #
1X set-up fee......No idea what this could be, called AT&T who referred me to OAN who has no idea and no information about this but will call me when they have more information. Did mention that my son is a Lawyer and they could not have been nicer, are going to credit my account for amount + any taxes and put through a cancellation in case this is a monthly charge. Yeah right, and my other son is the Easter bunny. Will be interesting to see if they call me back.
— Connie Inwood · 2007-04-17 09:13 · #
— Robert Beck · 2007-04-27 19:31 · #
Called Verizon and a rep said don't pay it, She attached a memo to my records about my call.I Also called the number for OAN and talked to Jaquline who said a credit would be issued. I also put a block on my Verizon account that will not allow billing for third parties such as OAN
It appears to be a VERY BIG SCAM that is making a lot of money for crooks.
— bdmech · 2007-05-04 14:25 · #
— 2BNV"D · 2007-05-10 14:21 · #
— Su-ching · 2007-05-13 20:00 · #
— Rosemary Heller · 2007-05-15 09:08 · #
— shirley L peck · 2007-05-26 14:10 · #
— shirley L peck · 2007-05-26 14:12 · #
— Patty · 2007-05-27 19:17 · #
FTC v. NATIONWIDE CONNECTIONS, INC., No. 06-16635-E (11th Cir.); No. 06-80180-
CIV-RYSKAMP/VITUNAC (S.D. Fla.)
Parties: Nationwide Connections, Inc.
Access One Communications, Inc.
Network One Services, Inc.
Willoughby Farr
Mary Lou Farr
Yaret Garcia
Erika Riaboukha
Qaadir Kaid
Billing Concepts, Inc.
ACI Billing Services, Inc. d/b/a OAN
BSG Clearing Solutions North America, LLC
The Billing Resource d/b/a Integretel
Assigned Attorneys: Laura M. Kim (BCP/MP)
Michael Davis
Collot Guerard
Richard McKewen
Marilyn E. Kerst (OGC)
Alleged Conduct: Unfair and deceptive practices in violation of Section 5 in connection with
the initiation of phone charges for purported long distance collect calls.
Status: Complaint for injunctive and other equitable relief filed 2/27/06.
TRO, asset freeze and preliminary injunction order entered 3/8/06.
First amended complaint adding defendants Billing Concepts, Inc., ACI
Billing Services, Inc. d/b/a OAN, BSG Clearing Solutions North
America, LLC and The Billing Resource d/b/a Integretel filed
9/21/06.
Amended preliminary injunction order entered 9/22/06.
Contempt order against Willoughby Farr, Mary Lou Farr and Danny
Trujillo (non-party) entered 9/22/06.
Notice of appeal by The Billing Resource d/b/a Integretel filed 11/11/06.
Order, granting appellant’s motion to stay the appeal pending the district
court’s ruling on pending relevant motions, but denying motion to
remand and temporarily relinquish jurisdiction to permit the
district court to rule on those motions, entered 1/29/07.
— john_3000 · 2007-06-12 09:49 · #
— Mark Boyer · 2007-06-13 21:47 · #
— Fred m · 2007-08-06 10:54 · #
FTC v. NATIONWIDE CONNECTIONS, INC., No. 06-16635-E (11th Cir.); No. 06-80180-
CIV-RYSKAMP/VITUNAC (S.D. Fla.)
Parties: Nationwide Connections, Inc.
Access One Communications, Inc.
Network One Services, Inc.
Willoughby Farr
Mary Lou Farr
Yaret Garcia
Erika Riaboukha
Qaadir Kaid
Biling Concepts, Inc.
ACI Billing Services, Inc. d/b/a Integretel
Assigned Attorneys: Laura M. Kim (BCP/MP
Robert Schoshinski
Collot Guerard
Richard McKewen
Marilyn E. Kerst (OGC)
Alleged Conduct: Unfair and deceptive practices in violation of Section 5 in connection with
the initiation of phone charges for purported long distance collect calls.
Status: Complaint for injunctive and other equitable relief filed 2/27/06.
TRO, asset freeze and preliminary injunction order entered 3/8/06.
First amended complaint adding defendants Billing Concepts, Inc., ACI
Billing Services, Inc. d/b/a OAN, BSG Clearing Solutions North
America, LLC and The Billing Resource d/b/a Integretel filed
9/21/06.
Amended preliminary injunction order entered 9/22/06.
Contempt order against Willoughby Farr, Mary Lou Farr and Danny
Trujillo (non-party) entered 9/22/06.
Notice of appeal by The Billing Resource d/b/a Integretel filed 11/11/06.
Order, granting appellant’s motion to stay the appeal pending the district
court’s ruling on pending relevant motions, but denying motion to
remand and temporarily relinquish jurisdiction to permit the
district court to rule on those motions, entered 1/29/07.
— john_3000 · 2007-08-07 12:38 · #
— Vickie Silko · 2007-08-10 11:49 · #
— Traci · 2007-08-30 23:00 · #
— lance sterling · 2007-09-05 10:01 · #
— shaa · 2007-10-09 11:32 · #
— Ann · 2007-10-12 13:51 · #
These scammers are getting a bit to safe. Where is law enforcement? There needs to be a class action suit against companies that try this process of adding to phone bills.
— Jon · 2007-10-15 09:57 · #
— April · 2007-10-25 12:44 · #
— Carlos C · 2007-10-29 20:36 · #
False charges of 7.57
Reason given-called 101 515 8000 WRONG
— Tom B · 2007-11-06 18:55 · #
FTC v. NATIONWIDE CONNECTIONS, INC., No. 07-14531-E (11th Cir.); No. 06-16635-E
(11th Cir.); No. 06-80180-CIV-RYSKAMP/VITUNAC (S.D. Fla.)
Parties: Nationwide Connections, Inc.
Access One Communications, Inc.
Network One Services, Inc.
Willoughby Farr
Mary Lou Farr
Yaret Garcia
Erika Riaboukha
Qaadir Kaid
Biling Concepts, Inc.
ACI Billing Services, Inc. d/b/a Integretel
Assigned Attorneys: Laura M. Kim (BCP/MP)
Robert Schoshinski
Collot Guerard
Richard McKewen
Marilyn E. Kerst (OGC)
John A. Singer
Alleged Conduct: Unfair and deceptive practices in violation of Section 5 in connection with
the initiation of phone charges for purported long distance collect calls.
Status: Complaint for injunctive and other equitable relief filed 2/27/06.
TRO, asset freeze and preliminary injunction order entered 3/8/06.
First amended complaint adding defendants Billing Concepts, Inc., ACI
Billing Services, Inc. d/b/a OAN, BSG Clearing Solutions North
America, LLC and The Billing Resource d/b/a Integretel filed
9/21/06.
Amended preliminary injunction order entered 9/22/06.
Contempt order against Willoughby Farr, Mary Lou Farr and Danny
Trujillo (non-party) entered 9/22/06.
Notice of appeal by The Billing Resource d/b/a Integretel filed 11/11/06.
Order, granting appellant’s motion to stay the appeal pending the district
court’s ruling on pending relevant motions, but denying motion to
remand and temporarily relinquish jurisdiction to permit the
district court to rule on those motions, entered 1/29/07.
Commission’s motion to compel granted 8/27/07.
Order to strike affirmative defenses entered 9/14/07.
Notice of bankruptcy filed by defendant The Billing Resource d/b/a
Integretel 9/17/07.
Proceedings against The Billing Resource d/b/a Integretel stayed due
defendant’s bankruptcy filing 9/20/07.
Second notice of appeal filed by The Billing Resource d/b/a Integretel
filed 9/24/07.
Defendant’s emergency motion for stay pending appeal filed 9/25/07;
motion conditionally granted 9/27/07.
Trial scheduled for 2/25/08.
— john_3000 · 2007-11-15 12:24 · #
FTC v. NATIONWIDE CONNECTIONS, INC., No. 07-14531-E (11th Cir.); No. 06-16635-E
(11th Cir.); No. 06-80180-CIV-RYSKAMP/VITUNAC (S.D. Fla.)
Parties: Nationwide Connections, Inc.
Access One Communications, Inc.
Network One Services, Inc.
Willoughby Farr
Mary Lou Farr
Yaret Garcia
Erika Riaboukha
Qaadir Kaid
Biling Concepts, Inc.
ACI Billing Services, Inc. d/b/a Integretel
Assigned Attorneys: Laura M. Kim (BCP/MP)
Robert Schoshinski
Collot Guerard
Richard McKewen
Marilyn E. Kerst (OGC)
John A. Singer
Alleged Conduct: Unfair and deceptive practices in violation of Section 5 in connection with
the initiation of phone charges for purported long distance collect calls.
Status: Complaint for injunctive and other equitable relief filed 2/27/06.
TRO, asset freeze and preliminary injunction order entered 3/8/06.
First amended complaint adding defendants Billing Concepts, Inc., ACI
Billing Services, Inc. d/b/a OAN, BSG Clearing Solutions North
America, LLC and The Billing Resource d/b/a Integretel filed
9/21/06.
Amended preliminary injunction order entered 9/22/06.
Contempt order against Willoughby Farr, Mary Lou Farr and Danny
Trujillo (non-party) entered 9/22/06.
Notice of appeal by The Billing Resource d/b/a Integretel filed 11/11/06.
Order, granting appellant’s motion to stay the appeal pending the district
court’s ruling on pending relevant motions, but denying motion to
remand and temporarily relinquish jurisdiction to permit the
district court to rule on those motions, entered 1/29/07.
Commission’s motion to compel granted 8/27/07.
Order to strike affirmative defenses entered 9/14/07.
Notice of bankruptcy filed by defendant The Billing Resource d/b/a
Integretel 9/17/07.
Proceedings against The Billing Resource d/b/a Integretel stayed due
defendant’s bankruptcy filing 9/20/07.
Second notice of appeal filed by The Billing Resource d/b/a Integretel
filed 9/24/07.
Defendant’s emergency motion for stay pending appeal filed 9/25/07;
motion conditionally granted 9/27/07.
Trial scheduled for 2/25/08.
— john_3000 · 2007-11-15 12:27 · #
— Brenda · 2007-11-17 12:32 · #
— Fred · 2007-12-13 08:27 · #
My mother blamed for this charge...for something I never did...
— Michelle Mossner · 2007-12-13 13:44 · #
— LENDA · 2007-12-14 08:01 · #
— hope · 2007-12-15 14:29 · #
— jonathan · 2007-12-17 21:02 · #
The best part is that when I called the 800 number Verizon gave me for their own fraud department, I got a message saying the number was out of service and I had to dial that same 10-15-15-800 directory assistance number for information about the number I was attempting to reach.
Curiously, the Verizon representative who tried this got straight through. I tried again and got the ad for the crammers again.
— Don Leighty · 2008-01-08 13:35 · #
— ana · 2008-01-23 23:09 · #
— toney moses · 2008-01-25 19:24 · #
— Ed Mills · 2008-01-27 17:03 · #
— Wayne Kelly · 2008-01-29 19:59 · #
— Jim · 2008-02-05 12:47 · #
— Mandi · 2008-02-19 14:15 · #
I filed a complaing with the FTC and the BBB.
— denise · 2008-02-26 13:08 · #
networkworld.com/community/node/25700
I am not a lawyer but as I read the judgment, all they have to do is give up their assets and promise not to keep stealing in certain of the ways they have been. They each get to keep $20K. They seem perfectly free to proceed with any new scams they can concoct. That's a pretty sweet deal for them, I'd say. Incarceration, preferably with daily waterboarding, would have been far more appropriate.
— john_3000 · 2008-03-06 09:39 · #
The first thing that FairPoint did was add an OAN charge for 10 15 15 800 use to the bill.
If you get stuck with such a charge, call your telecom carrier and ask them to remove it, and ask them to block the acceptance and billing of all 3rd party charges.
They will likely try to wiggle around the request- they make money off of these slammers- but be firm and remind them that they are obligated under federal mandates to do so.
I can pretty well guarantee that they will comply. If they will not, ask for a supervisor, and tell them that you will go to the PUC if need be, and tell the PUC that your telecom is assisting known slammers.
I have not yet run into a supervisor foolish enough to be unwilling to fix things at that point... they all know who these guys are, and they all know how to block the billing of these bogus charges.
— Cisco_gal · 2008-04-11 17:39 · #
— diana · 2008-05-17 00:20 · #
— Lois · 2008-05-20 16:16 · #
Sue each company in small claims court. If you are low income file an affidavit of inability to pay court costs you have to ask the clerk for one.
In the meantime get toll blocking on your landline purchase a prepaid cell phone for all your long distance needs. Make the company pay for the toll blocking once you win the lawsuit.
File complaints with your AGs, BBB, FTC, and FCC even though they don't seem to do anything sence justice is in Iraq right now.
When Barack becomes president this corporate BS will change. Don't expect Hillary or McCain to help you.
— blame mr. bush!!!! · 2008-05-26 12:27 · #
— Dave-o · 2008-06-03 15:57 · #
— jan · 2008-06-03 22:43 · #
— Reynaldo Vega · 2008-07-05 21:36 · #
— Southern_Belle · 2008-07-24 23:04 · #
— val · 2008-08-28 18:54 · #
We just received our September phone bill a few days ago. I noticed an unfamiliar charge for Dir. Assist to 101 515-8000 billed by Verizon as a "service" to OAN Services, Inc. It is only $5.49, plus a $1.65 USF Carrier Admin. Fee, plus $0.45 State sales tax for a total of $7.59. A small amount that most people would overlook and think nothing of paying without scrutinizing their phone bill. What caught my attention was the fact that we have one of those one rate long distance plans and the bill should be just about the exact same certain amount each month. My husband usually takes care of the bill paying, but this month I was helping so I started looking over the bill to see why it was higher than usual and found the suspicious looking OAN charge within my Verizon bill. I searched in vain in phone books and on the internet over the Labor Day weekend to try to locate area code 101 and can't seem to find its existance in the U.S., Puerto Rico, Canada, or Mexico. (I don't know anybody in or do business in three of those four places and I have one rate long distance in the U.S.) During all this searching while waiting for the holiday to be over so I could contact Verizon, I found OAN's website and it tells me (just like many of you said) that they seem to be some sort of financial institution, not a telecommunications company. Then I found THIS website and learned more about OAN than I ever wanted to know. Thanks everybody for sharing all your information and experiences with this scam. I will be able to call Verizon tomorrow, and in the meantime I can go to some of the websites you have so kindly posted, like the FTC, FCC, BBB, AG, etc.
Apparently these people just don't give up. It is a major puzzle to me why with so many complaints to the appropriate agencies over so long a period of time that these people are just continuing business as usual with no interference from the law.
— Victoria Pace · 2008-09-03 00:53 · #
as they are that they would be all over this phony OAN Services.That just shows'how well the phone companies try to protect their customers'.
I am hardpressed to believe that this has gone on so long and nothing has been done by the FCC or FTC.Let's flood the FCC and FTC with E-mails and maybe we can make some sort of effect on this BOGUS Co.and it would not hurt to do the same to your local telephone carrier.WAKE UP PEOPLE!!we have to protect ourselves when the US and LOCAL Government wont.Do your share and crank-up that PC and
flood them with mail.
— WilliamA.Barrow · 2008-09-03 08:49 · #
I just got off the phone with OAN Services, Inc. 1-800-892-8424 speaking with Kristine #82612 which by the way is also my confirmation number for my credit refund to my phone bill. She was reluctant to believe that the call hadn't been made and explained that they were just a billing clearinghouse and not the actual telecom company. I told her that I knew that and that the charges were fraudulent and that if they were involved in passing on fraudulent charges from a fly by night company that I knew they had received complaints about before, then that made them part of the fraud. I told her that I knew OAN and some of the companies they bill for had been reported to the FCC, FTC, various BBB's, various state's PUC's, and AG's offices in various states and that as soon as I hung up from talking to her I was also filing complaints with these agencies. Kristine also explained that 10 15 15 800 (it is shown as 101 515-8000 on my Verizon bill making it look like a legitimate phone #) is an access code for directory assistance. I explained to her that in every phone book I have and also according to Verizon, the way to reach directory assistance is by dialing the area code of the area you are looking to find a number in, then dialing 555-1212. Verizon was not familiar with dialing 10 15 15 800 to reach directory assistance. I told Kristine we have the phone numbers of people we want to call and haven't used directory assistance in years and years and that if on the off chance we did need help we would use the method described in the front of our phone book, 1+area code+555-1212. I told her also that my husband had been at work that night and I was most likely asleep at that hour. I then asked her that assuming I suddenly woke up and felt an urge to call an unknown directory assistance to get the phone number of some unknown (to me) person in some unknown place, how would I have gotten these strange (as Verizon put it) access numbers to this strange directory assistance seeing as how they are not listed in the front of any phone book under the how to reach directory assistance instructions? I repeatedly asked her how I would have gotten this unlisted access code to a strange directory assistance seeing as it is not in the phone book. She kept offering the same explanation word for word each time I asked. I finally said that I knew she was reading from a script and to put the script aside and answer my question "Assuming I woke up and suddenly wanted to make a call to this particular directory assistance, where would I locate this access number so I would know how to make the call to this directory assistance?". Eventually after many repeated tries she said it would have been on the recording. I asked what recording? She said it would be on the recording I would have heard when I called a disconnected number. I reminded her I was sleeping and wouldn't have been dialing a disconnected number in my sleep. By the way there is no record in their bill of any attempted call to a disconnected number. I asked her "then the only way I could have obtained this access number to this directory assistance is from a recording and no other way?" and she said "that is correct".
So there we have it folks. For those of us that have been billed for "directory assisatanc" from OAN using access number 10 15 15 800, according to OAN's own Kristine #82612, there is no way to get this asscess number other than to try to dial a disconnected number that you probably didn't have in the first place.
This just gets curious-er and curious-er. After I'm through typing this, I will be getting on the websites you all have suggested and filing complaints. Thanks for everyone's input.
— Victoria Pace · 2008-09-03 16:12 · #
— John, NY · 2008-09-23 09:19 · #
Willoughby Farr. He became a millionaire while in prison for "driving violations" by running this scam and is still in prison. Here is a story on it all:
tcpalm--DOT--com/news/2008/may/16/seized-items-jailhouse-millionaire-being-sold-sund/
Of course you have to replace the --DOT-- with a period.
It appears our Federal Trade Commission is nearly useless as an agent for justice. Here is their most recent compilation of case statuses:
ftc--DOT--gov/ogc/status/status.pdf
Search in the document for Willoughby to see a history of the case. All they did is recover a small fraction of the $35M he stole. As far as I can tell he gets zero additional jail time. Here is the FTC acting like they're not completely useless:
ftc--DOT--gov/opa/2008/03/cram.shtm
There is nothing there or in similar FTC pages about his mother and co-conspirators that suggests the apparent truth --- THE SCAM IS STILL GOING ON.
— john_3000 · 2008-10-21 13:28 · #
How would they get my address, I wonder? From AT&T?
Waiting....
— DWood, CA · 2008-10-21 16:01 · #
— clint · 2008-11-05 22:36 · #
Also, the phone number that "placed the collect call" came up as a BUSINESS number when I searched online. I couldn't get a name or address, without paying a fee. What business, does a BUSINESS have making a collect call to a residence anyway? I guess I'll have to WAIT to see how everything turns out, considering Cox (who tried to charge me for equipment I had returned to them) says they won't be able to get me my refund for services I had already paid for, for another 1-2 billing cycles. (Which irritates me beyond belief considering I should have gotten the REFUND check with my last statement...but since they wanted to charge me for the modem, I have to wait.)
Needless to say, I am not very happy with Cox, or this scam-operation...I'm just glad Cox finally said they would take the collect call charge off my bill.
— Raychel · 2008-11-21 12:33 · #
It is now April 26, 2010. I received an unauthorized charge on my Verizon bill, “billed on behalf of Access Savings,” it says. It further says to contact Operator Assistance Network at 1-800-944-9646 “if you have any questions concerning this portion of your bill.” I called, and can’t reach a live person. There is an option to cancel your account, even though I never opened an account with them, and it asks me to verify my e-mail address, and they have some long e-mail address that is nothing but a very long jumble of letters and numbers. When I hit the option to say it is incorrect, I get hung up on. Obviously these people are still at it, and have been for years, and nothing is being done about it! There have even been local news stories done about this across the country.
I called Verizon and the customer service rep said she’s never heard of this scam or this company, even though a google search reveals complaints going as far back as 2005. She said she removed the charge and put a “third party block” so that no third party companies can bill me through my Verizon account anymore. My question is, why did I have to go through all the trouble in the first place, and why is Verizon allowing these charges, considering it’s a well-known scam that’s been going on for years? In my mind, Verizon is complicit in this. Think about it, do you think Verizon (or any of these other companies mentioned) are billing on behalf of OAN or Access Savings out of the kindness of their hearts, or are these “legitimate” phone companies receiving a benefit (a small fee) to do the billing? I reported not only OAN and Access Savings, but also Verizon to the FTC and state Attorney General. People have been reporting them for years with no results, but maybe if enough people report them, then something will finally be done.
— Sue · 2010-04-26 08:23 · #